+- +-
Say hello if visiting :) by Gecko
11 Jan 2023, 07:43:05 pm

Seti is down again by Mike
09 Aug 2017, 10:02:44 am

Some considerations regarding OpenCL MultiBeam app tuning from algorithm view by Raistmer
11 Dec 2016, 06:30:56 am

Loading APU to the limit: performance considerations by Mike
05 Nov 2016, 06:49:26 am

Better sleep on Windows - new round by Raistmer
26 Aug 2016, 02:02:31 pm

Author Topic: laptop with quadro nvs 140m  (Read 8606 times)

chronek

  • Guest
laptop with quadro nvs 140m
« on: 08 Apr 2009, 08:03:32 am »
Hello
I have problem with gpu crunching on nvidia quadro nvs 140m - setiathome_6.08_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe use 100% of one cpu - i using 181.22 beta notebook cuda driver with inf update from laptopvideo2go site , boinc 6.6.20 , marks app_info.xml ... the same settings with laptop with gf 8600m gt working like a charm ... but here - cuda crunching use 100% of one cpu core...
Have someone the same problem?>

chronek

  • Guest
Re: laptop with quadro nvs 140m
« Reply #1 on: 09 Apr 2009, 02:45:55 am »
hmm i found , seti-cuda going to fallback because of not enough video card memory , but it is strange that cuda needs at least 256MB , when cpu crunching only 64Mb with system
Can someone tweak seti-cuda to run on video card who have only 128Mb ?

Offline Claggy

  • Alpha Tester
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • ***
  • Posts: 3111
    • My computers at Seti Beta
Re: laptop with quadro nvs 140m
« Reply #2 on: 09 Apr 2009, 09:59:37 am »
hmm i found , seti-cuda going to fallback because of not enough video card memory , but it is strange that cuda needs at least 256MB , when cpu crunching only 64Mb with system
Can someone tweak seti-cuda to run on video card who have only 128Mb ?

I was Beta Testing MB 6.07/6.08 with the CPU fallback mode on my 128Mb 8400M GS, very very slow, took up to 6 hours a WU, when AK_V8 takes a hour and a half or so,
Then there was the problem of Boinc 6.4.5 running 3 apps on the CPU (on a dual core), haven't tried running the Cuda app on Boinc 6.6.21 to see what happens, Yet.
I suppose the optimisers could try lowering the memory requirement, or finding ways to use less memory, But i don't think it would be very high on their Priorities.

Claggy

 

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?
Members
Total Members: 97
Latest: ToeBee
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 59559
Total Topics: 1672
Most Online Today: 352
Most Online Ever: 983
(20 Jan 2020, 03:17:55 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 348
Total: 348
Powered by EzPortal