Home
Forum
Help
Search
Downloads
Login
Register
Seti@Home optimized science apps and information
»
Forum
»
Optimized Seti@Home apps
»
Windows
»
Weird results with 2.0
Home
Forums
FAQ
Downloads
Profile
Say hello if visiting :)
by
Gecko
11 Jan 2023, 07:43:05 pm
Seti is down again
by
Mike
09 Aug 2017, 10:02:44 am
Some considerations regarding OpenCL MultiBeam app tuning from algorithm view
by
Raistmer
11 Dec 2016, 06:30:56 am
Loading APU to the limit: performance considerations
by
Mike
05 Nov 2016, 06:49:26 am
Better sleep on Windows - new round
by
Raistmer
26 Aug 2016, 02:02:31 pm
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Weird results with 2.0 (Read 10983 times)
hiamps
Knight o' The Round Table
Posts: 126
Weird results with 2.0
«
on:
27 Nov 2006, 08:37:07 pm »
My credit claimed was way out there...
<core_client_version>5.4.11</core_client_version>
<stderr_txt>
ChirpData--[ak's_sse3_chirp]: 9857556 (chosen)
GetPeak--[hand_opt]: 3229 (chosen)
f_sum--[original]: 32352 (chosen)
GetChiSq--[hoisted+abs(]: 36890 (chosen)
IPP FFT SSE2(64K)[original]: 4214609 (chosen)
Bench Time: 1.95 seconds
work_len=1048576
Optimized Windows SETI@Home Enhanced application
Optimizers: Ben Herndon, Josef Segur, Alex Kan, Simon Zadra
Version: Windows SSE2 32-bit based on seti V5.15 'Chicken Good!'
Rev: (R-2.0|QxB|FFT:IPP_SSE2|Ben-Joe|)
CPUID: 'AMD K8 Opteron DC 1 (Denmark)'
cpus: 1 cores: 2 threads: 1 cache: L1=64K L2=1024K L3=0K
features: mmx 3Dnow 3Dnow+ sse sse2 sse3
speed: 2562 MHz -- read megs/sec: L1=14050, L2=7023, RAM=3346
Work Unit Info
True angle range: 0.426464
ChirpData--[ak's_sse3_chirp]: 9872393 (chosen)
GetPeak--[hand_opt]: 2462 (chosen)
f_sum--[original]: 32503 (chosen)
GetChiSq--[hoisted+abs(]: 35852 (chosen)
IPP FFT SSE2(64K)[original]: 4207780 (chosen)
Bench Time: 2.00 seconds
work_len=1048576
Spikes Pulses Triplets Gaussians Flops
1 2 5 4 13426431975160353000
</stderr_txt>
Validate state Valid
Claimed credit 52058503.6073926
Granted credit 62.3993140302431
application version 5.17
Logged
Pepo
Guest
Re: Weird results with 2.0
«
Reply #1 on:
29 Nov 2006, 07:06:40 pm »
Quote from: hiamps on 27 Nov 2006, 08:37:07 pm
My credit claimed was way out there...
[...]
Validate state Valid
Claimed credit 52058503.6073926
If we could have the
-10 Million club
, back when the app was not that optimized, why not having a +52 Million club now?
Peter
Logged
Simon
Ni!
Knight who says 'Ni!'
Posts: 1045
Re: Weird results with 2.0
«
Reply #2 on:
29 Nov 2006, 08:29:21 pm »
Something similar happened to msattler's Athlon FX or Opteron rig, as well.
That one was overclocked pretty much to the limit and sometimes claimed wildly outrageous numbers. When he dialed it back a bit, those went away, if I remember correctly.
All in all, I wouldn't freak out about it as it's very likely those claims will be ignored, or rather, you'll get the average quorum (which doesn't include your overclaim in this case).
I had something like that happen recently as well when I was testing a pre-2.0 beta app because I had defined a variable as a double instead of an int, but that's what happened for those results. I did post about them in the "computation errors" thread at the s@h forums to make sure though.
HTH,
Simon.
Logged
hiamps
Knight o' The Round Table
Posts: 126
Re: Weird results with 2.0
«
Reply #3 on:
30 Nov 2006, 03:29:53 pm »
Thanks Simon, I am overclocked a bit......
Logged
Vyper
Alpha Tester
Knight Templar
Posts: 376
Re: Weird results with 2.0
«
Reply #4 on:
01 Dec 2006, 10:58:31 am »
This is offtopic but has to do with Rev2.0 application as well.
I tried to modify your source to force a core2 specific optimized rev2.0 app but it kinda fails..
The compilation goes well and in the progress window i have looked up the USE_SSSE3 and it executes as it should ... but..
when i run the application the output in the stderr.txt has printed that it uses MMX mode.
Rev: (R-2.0|QxW|FFT:IPP_MMX|Ben-Joe)
Instead of for instance SSE2, SSSE3 and so on.. I've managed to compile a version that is 1 sec faster than Simons Rev 1.3 in the testprogram for fast mid and slow test, for Core2 duo but when i try on live WU's its about 600 sec slower.. on a regular WU but validates perfectly..
And it says that it uses IPP_MMX..
Check out:
core_client_version>5.3.12.tx36</core_client_version>
<stderr_txt>
Optimized SETI@Home Enhanced application
Optimizers: Ben Herndon, Josef Segur, Alex Kan, Simon Zadra
Version: Windows SSSE3 32-bit 'Ni!' based on seti V5.15 'Chicken Good!'
Rev: (R-2.0|MMX|FFT:IPP_MMX|Ben-Joe)
CPUID: 'Intel C2D Core 2 Duo (Conroe)'
cpus: 1 cores: 2 threads: 1 cache: L1=32K L2=4096K L3=0K
features: mmx sse sse2 sse3 ssse3
speed: 3294 MHz -- read megs/sec: L1=12297, L2=10649, RAM=6562
Work Unit Info
True angle range: 0.670041
Spikes Pulses Triplets Gaussians Flops
0 0 0 0 8917670335985
</stderr_txt>
Does anyone know why the code jumps to a MMX optimized code when a Core2 is using the app??
Kind Regards Vyper
Logged
BenHer
Guest
Re: Weird results with 2.0
«
Reply #5 on:
01 Dec 2006, 03:36:32 pm »
Vyper,
Some parts of the "version" line are constant, and some others are variable-depending on DEFINE'd values.
All of them are created inside the 'Optimizer/chicken.h' header file.
Logged
Vyper
Alpha Tester
Knight Templar
Posts: 376
Re: Weird results with 2.0
«
Reply #6 on:
01 Dec 2006, 04:35:07 pm »
Ok thx.. Will look into it..
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Seti@Home optimized science apps and information
»
Forum
»
Optimized Seti@Home apps
»
Windows
»
Weird results with 2.0
Welcome,
Guest
.
Please
login
or
register
.
Login:
Password:
Login for:
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Forgot your password?
Members
Total Members: 97
Latest:
ToeBee
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 59559
Total Topics: 1672
Most Online Today: 4
Most Online Ever: 983
(20 Jan 2020, 03:17:55 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 104
Total: 104
Powered by
EzPortal