+- +-
Say hello if visiting :) by Gecko
11 Jan 2023, 07:43:05 pm

Seti is down again by Mike
09 Aug 2017, 10:02:44 am

Some considerations regarding OpenCL MultiBeam app tuning from algorithm view by Raistmer
11 Dec 2016, 06:30:56 am

Loading APU to the limit: performance considerations by Mike
05 Nov 2016, 06:49:26 am

Better sleep on Windows - new round by Raistmer
26 Aug 2016, 02:02:31 pm

Author Topic: Firwall Warnings Question (From Seti NC Forum)  (Read 7298 times)

Ghost0210

  • Guest
Firwall Warnings Question (From Seti NC Forum)
« on: 01 Jul 2010, 01:15:28 pm »
Hi All,

Had a query on the NC forum @ Main asking about some firewall warnings a users getting
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=60568
Hope someone here could shed some light on why he's getting these messages?
Post from user:
Quote
It seems that MB_6.08_CUDA_V12_noKill_FPLim2048.exe is attempting to initiate outgoing connections to 207.46.212.122 (Microsoft Corp) and 128.32.18.189 (isaac.ssl.berkeley.edu).
Thanks
« Last Edit: 01 Jul 2010, 01:17:30 pm by Ghost0210 »

Offline Claggy

  • Alpha Tester
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • ***
  • Posts: 3111
    • My computers at Seti Beta
Re: Firwall Warnings Question (From Seti NC Forum)
« Reply #1 on: 01 Jul 2010, 01:32:53 pm »
Sounds like it's eithier getting -177 errors, or crashed because of a different reason, i beliewe isaac.ssl.berkeley.edu is where the Symbol files for crashes is stored,
(isaac.ssl.berkeley.edu has been under stress because of Seti's -177 storm) and it'll be reporting it's crashed to microsoft too,

Claggy

Offline Jason G

  • Construction Fraggle
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 8980
Re: Firwall Warnings Question (From Seti NC Forum)
« Reply #2 on: 01 Jul 2010, 01:54:45 pm »
Yup.  Boincapi, the 'library bits' compiled into all science applications under the Boinc framework, are wired to trigger an internal 'Boinc Runtime Debugger' when some crash occurs.  Checking the stderr.txt output for such a crashed task originating from third party builds will most often look like gibberish because neither Berkeley, nor Microsoft have symbols for those for the debugger mechanism to locate (But it tries anyway). 

Berkeley does, I assume, have symbol files in a symbol repository (A windows development thing) for stock applications & Boinc components, and Microsoft certainly has publicly available debug symbols for their windows components etc, so It can be a useful tool for deciphering what's going on in some specific cases .... But more often that not crashes originate in some not directly related driver & such, where symbols usually aren't available.

Either allowing or blocking those requests for debug information (symbol files) doesn't matter to anyone really, so it's a personal choice.

Jason

Ghost0210

  • Guest
Re: Firwall Warnings Question (From Seti NC Forum)
« Reply #3 on: 01 Jul 2010, 02:10:26 pm »
Thanks Jason/Claggy  ;D

 

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?
Members
Total Members: 97
Latest: ToeBee
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 59559
Total Topics: 1672
Most Online Today: 659
Most Online Ever: 983
(20 Jan 2020, 03:17:55 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 657
Total: 657
Powered by EzPortal