+- +-
Say hello if visiting :) by Gecko
11 Jan 2023, 07:43:05 pm

Seti is down again by Mike
09 Aug 2017, 10:02:44 am

Some considerations regarding OpenCL MultiBeam app tuning from algorithm view by Raistmer
11 Dec 2016, 06:30:56 am

Loading APU to the limit: performance considerations by Mike
05 Nov 2016, 06:49:26 am

Better sleep on Windows - new round by Raistmer
26 Aug 2016, 02:02:31 pm

Author Topic: App_info on a Q9400 Quad Core  (Read 7891 times)

ndblaikie

  • Guest
App_info on a Q9400 Quad Core
« on: 21 Jan 2010, 05:33:32 pm »
This is more to see if my app_info is correct for a Q9400. I am completing a workunit in about 3 hours which seems rather high. I am using optimized apps.

Here is my app_info

<app_info>
<app>
<name>setiathome_enhanced</name>
</app>
<file_info>
<name>AK_v8b_win_SSE41.exe</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<app_version>
<app_name>setiathome_enhanced</app_name>
<version_num>528</version_num>
<file_ref>
<file_name>AK_v8b_win_SSE41.exe</file_name>
<main_program/>
</file_ref>
</app_version>
<app_version>
<app_name>setiathome_enhanced</app_name>
<version_num>603</version_num>
<flops>3398200364.14919025</flops>
<file_ref>
<file_name>AK_v8b_win_SSE41.exe</file_name>
<main_program/>
</file_ref>
</app_version>
<app>
<name>astropulse_v5</name>
</app>
<file_info>
<name>ap_5.03r112_SSE3.exe</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<app_version>
<app_name>astropulse_v5</app_name>
<version_num>503</version_num>
<flops>5048754826.7359398</flops>
<file_ref>
<file_name>ap_5.03r112_SSE3.exe</file_name>
<main_program/>
</file_ref>
</app_version>
<app>
<name>astropulse_v505</name>
</app>
<file_info>
<name>ap_5.05r168_SSE3.exe</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<app_version>
<app_name>astropulse_v505</app_name>
<version_num>505</version_num>
<flops>5048754826.7359398</flops>
<file_ref>
<file_name>ap_5.05r168_SSE3.exe</file_name>
<main_program/>
</file_ref>
</app_version>
<app>
<name>setiathome_enhanced</name>
</app>
<file_info>
<name>MB_6.08_CUDA_V12_VLARKill_FPLim2048.exe</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<file_info>
<name>cudart.dll</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<file_info>
<name>cufft.dll</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<file_info>
<name>libfftw3f-3-1-1a_upx.dll</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<app_version>
<app_name>setiathome_enhanced</app_name>
<version_num>608</version_num>
<flops>5800000000</flops>
<plan_class>cuda</plan_class>
<avg_ncpus>0.040000</avg_ncpus>
<max_ncpus>0.040000</max_ncpus>
<coproc>
<type>CUDA</type>
<count>1</count>
</coproc>
<file_ref>
<file_name>MB_6.08_CUDA_V12_VLARKill_FPLim2048.exe</file_name>
<main_program/>
</file_ref>
<file_ref>
<file_name>cudart.dll</file_name>
</file_ref>
<file_ref>
<file_name>cufft.dll</file_name>
</file_ref>
<file_ref>
<file_name>libfftw3f-3-1-1a_upx.dll</file_name>
</file_ref>
</app_version>
</app_info>

Offline MarkJ

  • Knight o' The Realm
  • **
  • Posts: 96
Re: App_info on a Q9400 Quad Core
« Reply #1 on: 24 Jan 2010, 07:17:44 am »
This is more to see if my app_info is correct for a Q9400. I am completing a workunit in about 3 hours which seems rather high. I am using optimized apps.

Here is my app_info

<app_info>
...
</app_info>

Looks okay, however i'd probably go with the SSSE3 ak v8b app. If you have a 64 bit OS then use the 64 bit one.

Leopoldo

  • Guest
Re: App_info on a Q9400 Quad Core
« Reply #2 on: 25 Jan 2010, 12:22:58 pm »
... I am completing a workunit in about 3 hours which seems rather high. I am using optimized apps. ...

Period of 3 hours is normal for present WUs with changed chirprate (I'm owner of Q9400 also). Crunching time doubled (and credit too) since workunit processing resolution doubled.

Unoptimized non-CUDA stock app uses about 5 hours to crunch a single modern workunit. Feel the difference...
« Last Edit: 25 Jan 2010, 02:07:15 pm by Leopoldo »

 

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?
Members
Total Members: 97
Latest: ToeBee
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 59559
Total Topics: 1672
Most Online Today: 656
Most Online Ever: 983
(20 Jan 2020, 03:17:55 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 655
Total: 655
Powered by EzPortal