+- +-
Say hello if visiting :) by Gecko
11 Jan 2023, 07:43:05 pm

Seti is down again by Mike
09 Aug 2017, 10:02:44 am

Some considerations regarding OpenCL MultiBeam app tuning from algorithm view by Raistmer
11 Dec 2016, 06:30:56 am

Loading APU to the limit: performance considerations by Mike
05 Nov 2016, 06:49:26 am

Better sleep on Windows - new round by Raistmer
26 Aug 2016, 02:02:31 pm

Author Topic: Anyone using CodeAnalyst with SETI app?  (Read 6657 times)

Offline Raistmer

  • Working Code Wizard
  • Volunteer Developer
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 14349
Anyone using CodeAnalyst with SETI app?
« on: 31 Jan 2008, 02:33:24 pm »
I tried to run pipeline simulation with SETI app but some exception occurs at loading time preventing to collect execution trace. The worst is the log windo fot trace collector module closing immediately after error so it's not possible to read where and what going wrong.  Anyone tried CodeAnalyst? Any comments? (I run profiling for AMD 64 Venice so vTune probably not an option).
(Time based and event based profiling sessions run just fine).

Offline Jason G

  • Construction Fraggle
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 8980
Re: Anyone using CodeAnalyst with SETI app?
« Reply #1 on: 31 Jan 2008, 06:28:28 pm »
I had a similar issue instrumenting for VTune.  I think for VTune the full instrumentation was attempting to instrument some kernel or C Runtime functions it shouldn't have been.  For VTune, and I don't know if this is possible on CodeAnalyst, the solution was to do custom instrumentation and deselect all functions beginning with an _underscore.

Jason

Offline Raistmer

  • Working Code Wizard
  • Volunteer Developer
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 14349
Re: Anyone using CodeAnalyst with SETI app?
« Reply #2 on: 01 Feb 2008, 01:12:43 pm »
CodeAnalyst doesn't require any instrumentation but requires pdb-file with symbol names. If it's possible to exclude from debug info range of functions maybe it could be possible to check if this helps :) Probably it's possible to generate debug info only for modules under interest (actually only opt_sse2's functions needed).. will try to rebuild, thanx for idea :)

 

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?
Members
Total Members: 97
Latest: ToeBee
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 59559
Total Topics: 1672
Most Online Today: 298
Most Online Ever: 983
(20 Jan 2020, 03:17:55 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 254
Total: 254
Powered by EzPortal