+- +-
Say hello if visiting :) by Gecko
11 Jan 2023, 07:43:05 pm
Seti is down again by Mike
09 Aug 2017, 10:02:44 am
Some considerations regarding OpenCL MultiBeam app tuning from algorithm view by Raistmer
11 Dec 2016, 06:30:56 am
Loading APU to the limit: performance considerations by Mike
05 Nov 2016, 06:49:26 am
Better sleep on Windows - new round by Raistmer
26 Aug 2016, 02:02:31 pm
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Executable Size - 2.2B vs. 2.4  (Read 8041 times)

Havoc

  • Guest
Executable Size - 2.2B vs. 2.4
« on: 15 Aug 2007, 05:41:01 pm »
How did you reduce the executable size so considerably on the new version of the Windows executable?
Logged

Offline Josef W. Segur

  • Janitor o' the Board
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 3112
Re: Executable Size - 2.2B vs. 2.4
« Reply #1 on: 17 Aug 2007, 12:09:22 am »
Quote from: Havoc on 15 Aug 2007, 05:41:01 pm
How did you reduce the executable size so considerably on the new version of the Windows executable?

To oversimplify what took a lot of work, Simon discovered that not doing the overall ipo optimization offered by the Intel compiler produced faster and smaller executables.
                                                                                  Joe
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?
Members
Total Members: 97
Latest: ToeBee
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 59559
Total Topics: 1672
Most Online Today: 355
Most Online Ever: 983
(20 Jan 2020, 03:17:55 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 52
Total: 52
Powered by EzPortal