+- +-
Say hello if visiting :) by Gecko
11 Jan 2023, 07:43:05 pm

Seti is down again by Mike
09 Aug 2017, 10:02:44 am

Some considerations regarding OpenCL MultiBeam app tuning from algorithm view by Raistmer
11 Dec 2016, 06:30:56 am

Loading APU to the limit: performance considerations by Mike
05 Nov 2016, 06:49:26 am

Better sleep on Windows - new round by Raistmer
26 Aug 2016, 02:02:31 pm

Author Topic: GPU client  (Read 160848 times)

Offline Raistmer

  • Working Code Wizard
  • Volunteer Developer
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 14349
Re: GPU client
« Reply #120 on: 12 Feb 2008, 03:08:21 pm »
Btw for the record.. cuda application works in X64 Xp environment if u use 32 bit cuda toolkit in Windows XP x86-64 instead of 64 bit.  Noticed that today!  ;D
Hm, did you complete toolkit install or just used separate DDLs needed by seticuda?

Offline Vyper

  • Alpha Tester
  • Knight Templar
  • ***
  • Posts: 376
Re: GPU client
« Reply #121 on: 12 Feb 2008, 05:57:43 pm »
Complete!

Numanoid

  • Guest
Re: GPU client
« Reply #122 on: 12 Feb 2008, 09:58:17 pm »
Thanks for the help thus far, all.

I renamed the optimized client to default-5-15.exe and moved sahcuda.exe to the Science_apps folder.  The bench ran correctly, but I ran into more errors.

I've attached the log.



[attachment deleted by admin]

Offline Marius

  • Knight o' The Realm
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: GPU client
« Reply #123 on: 14 Feb 2008, 05:49:38 pm »
Curious, how do i test the sahcuda.exe?
I installed cuda 1.0 + sdk but all i get is:

SETI@home error -108 Unknown error
from boinc_init_diagnostics()
File: ..\main.cpp
Line: 239

Do i need to install cuda 1.1? or do i need more to run sahcuda (or the sahcudavarch11 etc)

Offline Devaster

  • Volunteer Developer
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 653
  • I like Duke !!!
Re: GPU client
« Reply #124 on: 17 Feb 2008, 06:13:02 am »
this not related to cuda - cuda eerors are another ....

clone

  • Guest
Re: GPU client
« Reply #125 on: 17 Feb 2008, 11:39:08 am »
I am confused with all the info in here so i dont really understand what i need to do to get this up and running
i have a vista 64 bit machine however my understanding is that if i installed the cuda 32bit s/w then no issues

i have a quadcore at 3.4ghz
and 3 8800 ultras in a sli configuration i have to use the 169.25 drivers for this to work however that is a higher revision then the .11
4gb of memory

currently if i try to run the knabench 1.43 at default it goes to cpu 1 affinity if i set it to use 0-3 it will still only used 25% of the total power of the cpu

i also do not know were to put the sahcuda sahcudagpu11 sahcudavarch11 

i also see many refrences to xml files but i dont know were these are coming from or the edit i need to make to them or were they need to go

i moved the sahcuda exes into the science apps location


= Knabench 1.43 W32-W64 02/12/2007 by Kna + Simon =
= mods: quick timetable, stderr, speedup/ratio    =

 7 testWU(s) found
   └─(testWU-1.wu)
   └─(testWU-2.wu)
   └─(testWU-3.wu)
   └─(testWU-4.wu)
   └─(testWU-5.wu)
   └─(testWU-6.wu)
   └─(testWU-7.wu)

 1 reference science app(s) found
   └─(default-515.exe)

 3 science app(s) found
   └─(sahcuda.exe)
   └─(sahcudagpu11.exe)
   └─(sahcudavarch11.exe)

======================================

Stopping Boinc ...
The BOINC service is not started.

More help is available by typing NET HELPMSG 3521.

------------
Running app : default-515.exe with -nographics
with WU     : testWU-1.wu
Started at  : 11:34:34
Ended at    : 11:39:49
Elapsed time: 315 seconds
Result      : stored as ref for validation.
------------
Running app : sahcuda.exe with -verbose
with WU     : testWU-1.wu
Started at  : 11:39:49
Ended at    : 11:39:50
Elapsed time: 1 seconds
Speedup     : 99.68%
Ratio       : 315.00 x
Result      : DIFFERENT.
------------
Running app : sahcudagpu11.exe with -verbose
with WU     : testWU-1.wu
Started at  : 11:39:50
Ended at    : 11:39:51
Elapsed time: 1 seconds
Speedup     : 99.68%
Ratio       : 315.00 x
Result      : DIFFERENT.
------------
Running app : sahcudavarch11.exe with -verbose
with WU     : testWU-1.wu
Started at  : 11:39:51
Ended at    : 11:39:51
Elapsed time: 0 seconds
Speedup     : 100.00%
Ratio       : 1.#J x
Result      : DIFFERENT.
------------
Running app : default-515.exe with -nographics
with WU     : testWU-2.wu
Started at  : 11:39:51


Quick timetable

WU : testWU-1.wu
default-515.exe : 315 seconds
sahcuda.exe : 1 seconds
Speedup: 99.68%, Ratio: 315.00 x
sahcudagpu11.exe : 1 seconds
Speedup: 99.68%, Ratio: 315.00 x
sahcudavarch11.exe : 0 seconds
Speedup: 100.00%, Ratio: 1.#J x

WU : testWU-2.wu
default-515.exe : 365 seconds
sahcuda.exe : 0 seconds
Speedup: 100.00%, Ratio: 1.#J x
sahcudagpu11.exe : 1 seconds
Speedup: 99.73%, Ratio: 365.00 x
sahcudavarch11.exe : 0 seconds
Speedup: 100.00%, Ratio: 1.#J x

WU : testWU-3.wu
default-515.exe : 396 seconds
sahcuda.exe : 1 seconds
Speedup: 99.75%, Ratio: 396.00 x
sahcudagpu11.exe : 0 seconds
Speedup: 100.00%, Ratio: 1.#J x
sahcudavarch11.exe : 1 seconds
Speedup: 99.75%, Ratio: 396.00 x

WU : testWU-4.wu
default-515.exe : 105 seconds
sahcuda.exe : 0 seconds
Speedup: 100.00%, Ratio: 1.#J x
sahcudagpu11.exe : 0 seconds
Speedup: 100.00%, Ratio: 1.#J x
sahcudavarch11.exe : 0 seconds
Speedup: 100.00%, Ratio: 1.#J x

WU : testWU-5.wu
default-515.exe : 368 seconds
sahcuda.exe : 1 seconds
Speedup: 99.73%, Ratio: 368.00 x
sahcudagpu11.exe : 0 seconds
Speedup: 100.00%, Ratio: 1.#J x
sahcudavarch11.exe : 0 seconds
Speedup: 100.00%, Ratio: 1.#J x

WU : testWU-6.wu
default-515.exe : 580 seconds
sahcuda.exe : 1 seconds
Speedup: 99.83%, Ratio: 580.00 x
sahcudagpu11.exe : 1 seconds
Speedup: 99.83%, Ratio: 580.00 x
sahcudavarch11.exe : 1 seconds
Speedup: 99.83%, Ratio: 580.00 x

WU : testWU-7.wu
default-515.exe : 258 seconds
sahcuda.exe : 1 seconds
Speedup: 99.61%, Ratio: 258.00 x
sahcudagpu11.exe : 1 seconds
Speedup: 99.61%, Ratio: 258.00 x
sahcudavarch11.exe : 1 seconds
Speedup: 99.61%, Ratio: 258.00 x


======================================


the  sec run times make be belive that it is not running at all and is geting some sort of error ?


if i try to run the files by the self in the seti projects location i get
SETI@home error -108 Unknown error
from boinc_init_diagnostics()
File: ..\main.cpp
Line: 239

SETI@home error -108 Unknown error
from boinc_init_diagnostics()
File: ..\main.cpp
Line: 239

SETI@home error -108 Unknown error
from boinc_init_diagnostics()
File: ..\main.cpp
Line: 239

i see that some one says to move the  init_data.xml  file but i dont know were that is from or were to move it to or what edits to make


ok with bionic i figured out that app info xml file is really just telling the service witch exe to proc i got it working with KWSN_2.4_SSSE3_IPP_Ben-Joe however when i tried to set it to either of the 3 sahcuda exe's it would fail to inilize and spam the message log

also are under 2 hour jobs normal ? or is that only because i have just etup bionic now and it is trying to base line ?
« Last Edit: 17 Feb 2008, 12:39:30 pm by clone »

Radiohead

  • Guest
Re: GPU client
« Reply #126 on: 17 Feb 2008, 12:49:22 pm »
i have a vista 64 bit machine however my understanding is that if i installed the cuda 32bit s/w then no issues
ONLY Windows XP....
http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_get.html#windows

clone

  • Guest
Re: GPU client
« Reply #127 on: 17 Feb 2008, 02:22:28 pm »
i have a vista 64 bit machine however my understanding is that if i installed the cuda 32bit s/w then no issues
ONLY Windows XP....
http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_get.html#windows

3 way sli will only work under vista

do any of the combatablity tools work  ?

I also have the abiltiy to load virtual machines or would cuda not work under vmware ?

citroja

  • Guest
Re: GPU client
« Reply #128 on: 18 Feb 2008, 04:30:32 am »
hey all,

  Its been a while but I finally got an 8000 series video card (8600 GTS).  So now I can start testing...(it's in a comp running Vista, is that going to be an issue?)

  I also picked up another 7800GTX card but I don't think that CUDA runs on the 7000 series card (please confirm).

-citroja

Offline Devaster

  • Volunteer Developer
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 653
  • I like Duke !!!
Re: GPU client
« Reply #129 on: 18 Feb 2008, 04:35:20 am »
to clone :

try it  i dont kjnow if it is real but try ....


i think if vmware don't virtualize a graphics card then it can run. but if a graphics card is virtual then no, CUDA need direct access to hw thru kernel ...

to citroja :

ee only winxp

citroja

  • Guest
Re: GPU client
« Reply #130 on: 18 Feb 2008, 04:47:21 am »
ok...well it looks like I am still sitting this one out :(

I will keep an eye on the posts and help as i can.

Good Luck!

-citroja

clone

  • Guest
Re: GPU client
« Reply #131 on: 18 Feb 2008, 10:59:07 am »
VMware creates a video device

"VMware SVGA ll"

So i guess i am out of luck unless i load xp

Currently i avg about 30 min a unit per core so 8 units an hour

How much faster would the 3 8800 ultra's be ?

riha

  • Guest
Re: GPU client
« Reply #132 on: 18 Feb 2008, 11:34:02 am »
Whatever happened to the version that works on on other cards than 8xxx cards?

 I am talking about this thread: http://lunatics.kwsn.net/windows/gpu-crunching-question.180.html



Offline Devaster

  • Volunteer Developer
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 653
  • I like Duke !!!
Re: GPU client
« Reply #133 on: 19 Feb 2008, 12:37:45 am »
this app development i have stopped ...

Offline Jason G

  • Construction Fraggle
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 8980
Re: GPU client
« Reply #134 on: 19 Feb 2008, 08:18:12 am »
Hi Devaster, Sorry to hear that, Though I am sure you have your reasons.  Although I have no idea about GPU programming I appreciate the potential it may hold to make extra use of a much untapped resource.  Would you like me to preserve any code in my repository ? [Technically OUR repository, It just happens to be at my place till we find a better more permanent home  ;) ]  It would seem a shame if that work should go to waste.

Jason
« Last Edit: 19 Feb 2008, 08:22:56 am by j_groothu »

 

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?
Members
Total Members: 97
Latest: ToeBee
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 59559
Total Topics: 1672
Most Online Today: 48
Most Online Ever: 983
(20 Jan 2020, 03:17:55 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 20
Total: 20
Powered by EzPortal