Author Topic: optimized sources (Read 548793 times)

_heinz · « **Reply #795 on:** 26 Mar 2012, 12:37:10 pm »

Updated Installers, v0.40 for Windows is available on the MainPage
Please read Installer v0.40 release notes before you install.
Thanks to all who are involved anyhow.
We have now more than 160 000 calls on this thread, thank you to all readers looking up here.

_heinz

_heinz · « **Reply #796 on:** 26 Mar 2012, 02:06:26 pm »

I always wanted to know how much energy my machines need to crunch.
I bought last a Watt measure unit and have now some values of my machines.

840 W, max 874 W V8-Xeon (1 GTX570, 2 GTX470)
230 W, max 270 W P4 with AGP HD4670
66 W, laptop i3, GT540M
31 W, R3600 ION
-------------------------------------
1167 W for all my machines
1,167 KWh
28,008 KWh per day
840,24 KWh per month

If now the price per KWh is known you can calculate your crunching costs.
In my case in France we have 8 hours/day to 0.0567 Euro and 16 hours/day 0,0916 Euro per KWh
280,08 KWh * 0.0567 Euro = 15,88 Euro
560.16 KWh * 0,0916 Euro = 51,31 Euro
--------------------------------------------------
summary 67,19 Euro
+ 19,5% Mwst = 13,10 Euro
+ power-connection costs/month = 7,50 Euro
--------------------------------------------------------
Total = 87,79 Euro/month without internet connection costs

actual credit/month is 36,763,527

87,79 Euro / 36,763527 Mio cc = 2,387964571516764 Euro per Mio cc
Today I have 326,832403 Mio credit
326,832403 Mio * 2,387964571516764 Euro/Mio = 780,4641991876895 Euro

my summary total crunching cost ~ 780,46 Euro
------------------------------------------------------------
Remark:
in Germany the price per KWh is 0,24 Euro strompreise-Deutschland
840,24 KWh / month * 0,24 Euro = 201,66 Euro/month in Germany
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
201,66 Euro/month in Germany

87,79 Euro/month in France

happy crunching in France, bleu blanc rouge

_heinz

Mike · « **Reply #797 on:** 26 Mar 2012, 04:17:59 pm »

That can´t be true Heinz.

I´m consuming 10.000 KW a year (dont ask) all in all.
I (only) pay €180 a month all together.

My FX is very power hungry even overclocked.

_heinz · « **Reply #798 on:** 27 Mar 2012, 05:10:34 am »

Quote from: Mike on 26 Mar 2012, 04:17:59 pm

That can´t be true Heinz.

Hi Mike,
all depends how many Graphicadapters are set into your FX,
perhaps you will be surprized if you test the power with a Watt-meter.
V8-Xeon has 3 graphicadapters( 1 GTX570 + 2 GTX470)
GTX570 runs at 832MHz
GTX470 runs at 730MHz
GTX470 runs at 730MHz
measured max power is 3,84 Ampere
220V * 3,84A = 844VA =844W =0,844KW for V8-Xeon,
what I have seen its is no big difference if i suspend work on all 8 cpus or not.
will make some measurement in the next days to document it.

heinz

Claggy · « **Reply #799 on:** 27 Mar 2012, 05:29:52 am »

_heinz, can you do an updated AP v6 Atom app when you have a chance please, while r555 & r557 are faster than r409 on an Atom, they are nowhere near as fast as your special Atom builds,
See the FFTW 3.3.1 static library development thread for benches on my Atom N450

Claggy

_heinz · « **Reply #800 on:** 27 Mar 2012, 06:29:35 am »

Quote from: Claggy on 27 Mar 2012, 05:29:52 am

_heinz, can you do an updated AP v6 Atom app when you have a chance please, while r555 & r557 are faster than r409 on an Atom, they are nowhere near as fast as your special Atom builds,
See the FFTW 3.3.1 static library development thread for benches on my Atom N450

Claggy

Hi Claggy, have seen it... be patient...have a lot around my ears at the moment.

Claggy · « **Reply #801 on:** 27 Mar 2012, 06:37:04 am »

Quote from: _heinz on 27 Mar 2012, 06:29:35 am

Quote from: Claggy on 27 Mar 2012, 05:29:52 am
_heinz, can you do an updated AP v6 Atom app when you have a chance please, while r555 & r557 are faster than r409 on an Atom, they are nowhere near as fast as your special Atom builds,
See the FFTW 3.3.1 static library development thread for benches on my Atom N450

Claggy
Hi Claggy, have seen it... be patient...have a lot around my ears at the moment.

O.K, thanks, i didn't know if you had seen it or not,

Claggy

_heinz · « **Reply #802 on:** 27 Mar 2012, 03:42:27 pm »

Quote from: Claggy on 27 Mar 2012, 05:29:52 am

_heinz, can you do an updated AP v6 Atom app when you have a chance please, while r555 & r557 are faster than r409 on an Atom, they are nowhere near as fast as your special Atom builds,
See the FFTW 3.3.1 static library development thread for benches on my Atom N450

Claggy

done, available in the Beta download area

heinz

_heinz · « **Reply #803 on:** 28 Mar 2012, 03:55:04 am »

How does this special astropulse v6 build for ATOM CPU's run shows the following quick test of ap_6.01r557_SSE3_ATOM_IXE_MKLS_O3.exe
More results in the Beta test area.

Bench results file R3600-20120328-0439-benchAP.txt
stored in .\Testdatas\ directory.

Quick timetable

WU : AP_single_pass.wu
ap_5.05r409_SSE.exe -verbose :
Elapsed 2118.152 secs
CPU 2110.569 secs
ap_5.05r468_SSE3_ATOM_IXE_MKLS_O3.exe -verbose :
Elapsed 1532.965 secs, speedup: 27.63% ratio: 1.38x
CPU 1528.560 secs, speedup: 27.58% ratio: 1.38x
ap_6.01r548_SSE_331_noAVX.exe -verbose :
Elapsed 2155.741 secs, speedup: -1.77% ratio: 0.98x
CPU 2145.170 secs, speedup: -1.64% ratio: 0.98x
ap_6.01r557_SSE3_ATOM_IXE_MKLS_O3.exe -verbose :
Elapsed 1530.656 secs, speedup: 27.74% ratio: 1.38x
CPU 1524.067 secs, speedup: 27.79% ratio: 1.38x

WU : Raistmer's_tiny.wu
ap_5.05r409_SSE.exe -verbose :
Elapsed 932.693 secs
CPU 926.724 secs
ap_5.05r468_SSE3_ATOM_IXE_MKLS_O3.exe -verbose :
Elapsed 650.598 secs, speedup: 30.25% ratio: 1.43x
CPU 646.219 secs, speedup: 30.27% ratio: 1.43x
ap_6.01r548_SSE_331_noAVX.exe -verbose :
Elapsed 850.933 secs, speedup: 8.77% ratio: 1.10x
CPU 846.961 secs, speedup: 8.61% ratio: 1.09x
ap_6.01r557_SSE3_ATOM_IXE_MKLS_O3.exe -verbose :
Elapsed 629.632 secs, speedup: 32.49% ratio: 1.48x
CPU 626.048 secs, speedup: 32.45% ratio: 1.48x

WU : sigind_v5.wu
ap_5.05r409_SSE.exe -verbose :
Elapsed 4540.926 secs
CPU 4508.039 secs
ap_5.05r468_SSE3_ATOM_IXE_MKLS_O3.exe -verbose :
Elapsed 3578.609 secs, speedup: 21.19% ratio: 1.27x
CPU 3539.101 secs, speedup: 21.49% ratio: 1.27x
ap_6.01r548_SSE_331_noAVX.exe -verbose :
Elapsed 4875.686 secs, speedup: -7.37% ratio: 0.93x
CPU 4810.275 secs, speedup: -6.70% ratio: 0.94x
ap_6.01r557_SSE3_ATOM_IXE_MKLS_O3.exe -verbose :
Elapsed 3355.997 secs, speedup: 26.09% ratio: 1.35x
CPU 3340.746 secs, speedup: 25.89% ratio: 1.35x

======================================
_heinz

_heinz · « **Reply #804 on:** 29 Mar 2012, 09:56:05 am »

Quote from: _heinz on 27 Mar 2012, 05:10:34 am

Quote from: Mike on 26 Mar 2012, 04:17:59 pm
what I have seen its is no big difference if i suspend work on all 8 cpus or not.
will make some measurement in the next days to document it.

some new measurement for V8-Xeon
~300W if I switch on the machine, selftest, no OS loaded
~286W windows is ready, logonscreen
~830W crunching distributed network on all 3 grapicadapters and run on 8 cpu's primegrids Sophie Germain (LLR)
~743W suspend work on CPU's, still GPU work is done
~370W suspend work on GPU's, wait till all fans are down, allow work on CPU's
means primegrid Sophie Germain (LLR) need still ~70W-90W to run on all 8 CPU's
The crunching 3 GPU's need then 743W -300W = 443W ,because the machine's base load power is ~300W.

summary we can say 2GTX470 + 1GTX570 need 450W for crunching (GPU load 99%)

the relation between the power of 3GPU/ 8CPU is 443W / 70W = 6,33 : 1

Total power of the crunching v8-Xeon is ~840W (820 - 860)

_heinz

_heinz · « **Reply #805 on:** 30 Mar 2012, 07:55:19 am »

Picture of the link shows GTX570 of V8-Xeon crunching.
EVGA_PRECISION_X_3.0.1 is available for download on the EVGA-site
It supports the new GTX680.

_heinz

_heinz · « **Reply #806 on:** 02 Apr 2012, 05:32:31 pm »

with the new EVGA-tool I screwed up the frequency of the GPU-adapters.
Have a look at the pictures:
GPU1_570 842MHz
GPU2_470 770MHz
GPU3_470 780MHz

_heinz

_heinz · « **Reply #807 on:** 03 Apr 2012, 08:03:13 pm »

As I'm running primegrid "The Riesel Problem LLR 6.13" it comes to a v8-xeon_overheating
CPU2 70 grd C
FBDIMM2 104 grd C
FBDIMM3 102 grd C
FBDIMM4 100 grd C

Still GPU2 run up to 100 grd and clocked down from 770 to 405MHz
GPU1 72 grd C
GPU3 80 grd C

_heinz

_heinz · « **Reply #808 on:** 22 Apr 2012, 12:17:52 pm »

New i7-3770 Ivy-Bridge is available in europa.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
INTEL Core i7-3770K @ 4 x 4,5GHz, Quad-Core "Ivy Bridge" • TDP: 77W • Fertigung: 22nm • DMI: 5GT/s •L2-Cache: 4x 256kB • L3-Cache: 8MB shared • Memory Controller: Dual Channel PC3-12800U (DDR3-1600) • Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, Multiplikator frei wählbar.
Intels Prozessoren mit Codenamen Ivy Bridge werden in 22-Nanometer-Technik gefertigt. Sie bieten neue Sicherheitsfunktionen, erweiterte Stromsparfunktionen und einen neuen Grafikkern, der DirectX 11 unterstützt.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GAINWARD GeForce GTX 680 Phantom, 4GB GDDR5, 2x DVI, HDMI, DisplayPort. Chiptakt: 1084MHz, Speichertakt: 1575MHz, Shadertakt: 1084MHz • Chip: GK104 • Speicherinterface: 256-bit • Stream-Prozessoren: 1536 • Textureinheiten: 128 • Fertigung: 28nm • Maximaler Verbrauch: 195W • DirectX: 11.1 • Shader Modell: 5.0 • Bauweise: Triple-Slot • Schnittstelle: PCIe 3.0 • Besonderheiten: werkseitig übertaktet, unterstützt HDCP, 4-Way-SLI
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Have a look at this Low-Noise-Gaming_PC

_heinz

_heinz · « **Reply #809 on:** 22 Apr 2012, 04:04:58 pm »

v8-Xeon with triple oced NV-adapters

GTX570
GPU Takt (Geometric Domain)   850 MHz (Original: 732 MHz, overclock: 16%)
GPU Takt (Shader Domain)   1700 MHz (Original: 1464 MHz, overclock: 16%)

GTX470
GPU Takt (Geometric Domain)   770 MHz (Original: 607 MHz, overclock: 27%)
GPU Takt (Shader Domain)   1540 MHz (Original: 1215 MHz, overclock: 27%)

GTX470
GPU Takt (Geometric Domain)   780 MHz (Original: 607 MHz, overclock: 29%)
GPU Takt (Shader Domain)   1560 MHz (Original: 1215 MHz, overclock: 28%)

so far the old GTX470 are good overclocked, all air cooled

_heinz