+- +-
Say hello if visiting :) by Gecko
11 Jan 2023, 07:43:05 pm

Seti is down again by Mike
09 Aug 2017, 10:02:44 am

Some considerations regarding OpenCL MultiBeam app tuning from algorithm view by Raistmer
11 Dec 2016, 06:30:56 am

Loading APU to the limit: performance considerations by Mike
05 Nov 2016, 06:49:26 am

Better sleep on Windows - new round by Raistmer
26 Aug 2016, 02:02:31 pm

Author Topic: MultiBeam v8 processing performance in pictures  (Read 16686 times)

Offline Raistmer

  • Working Code Wizard
  • Volunteer Developer
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 14349
MultiBeam v8 processing performance in pictures
« on: 05 Jun 2016, 02:52:37 pm »
Long time already I did not collect statistical performance data.
But last release of v8 and allowance of VLAR GUPPI (GBT data) on GPU requires some refreshement of those pictures.
While data collecting let's recall what we had before, in ~2011-2012.

This picture shows all collected data.
Immediately some misconception appears. That CPU process VLAR at about same speed as non-VLAR. No, data definitely show (and rising curve at lowAR confirms) that even opt CPU app processes VLAR at least twice (actually more) longer than VHAR.
So, VLAR is hard. Even for CPU.

« Last Edit: 05 Jun 2016, 03:08:02 pm by Raistmer »

Offline Raistmer

  • Working Code Wizard
  • Volunteer Developer
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 14349
Re: MultiBeam v8 processing performance in pictures
« Reply #1 on: 05 Jun 2016, 03:05:33 pm »
And changed range to zoom GPU data

Dots take large area - elapsed times for GPU application vary much (CPUlock mechanism allow more deterministic results these days).
But best case scenario (orange dots for example) very similar in behavior to CPU data.

Once again, VLAR is hard, indeed. Even for GPU.

Offline Raistmer

  • Working Code Wizard
  • Volunteer Developer
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 14349
Re: MultiBeam v8 processing performance in pictures
« Reply #2 on: 05 Jun 2016, 03:17:33 pm »
And some picture for another host, with nVidia GPU.
Much less data (host unstable and in different location, mostly AstroPulse statistics exploration at those times).
But again, VLAR is hard, for CPU too.

 

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?
Members
Total Members: 97
Latest: ToeBee
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 59559
Total Topics: 1672
Most Online Today: 6
Most Online Ever: 983
(20 Jan 2020, 03:17:55 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 233
Total: 233
Powered by EzPortal