+- +-
Say hello if visiting :) by Gecko
11 Jan 2023, 07:43:05 pm

Seti is down again by Mike
09 Aug 2017, 10:02:44 am

Some considerations regarding OpenCL MultiBeam app tuning from algorithm view by Raistmer
11 Dec 2016, 06:30:56 am

Loading APU to the limit: performance considerations by Mike
05 Nov 2016, 06:49:26 am

Better sleep on Windows - new round by Raistmer
26 Aug 2016, 02:02:31 pm

Author Topic: x38g reports  (Read 126882 times)

Offline perryjay

  • Knight Templar
  • ****
  • Posts: 427
Re: x38g reports
« Reply #225 on: 18 Jul 2011, 03:44:18 pm »
Can I slap ghost?  I had a great post all ready and when I hit post it gave me the message about a new post and ate my post!!!   >:(

Offline Jason G

  • Construction Fraggle
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 8980
Re: x38g reports
« Reply #226 on: 18 Jul 2011, 03:46:30 pm »
Can I slap ghost?  I had a great post all ready and when I hit post it gave me the message about a new post and ate my post!!!   >:(
  LoL, for next time, when that happens you can usually use your browser's back button, & copy to the clipboard, then paste it into a new post again  ;)

Slapping ghost could be difficult & potentially messy with all that ectoplasm, but fun to watch  ;D

Offline perryjay

  • Knight Templar
  • ****
  • Posts: 427
Re: x38g reports
« Reply #227 on: 18 Jul 2011, 03:51:28 pm »
Now, what was I saying? Something about not worrying about a couple of bad WUs as long as they help someone else. Oh yeah, and I have tried going back to driver 267.59 to see how it does. I don't see much difference from the 275.33 driver I was using. I went back because I thought I was having trouble getting Raistmers' app and yours to play nice together but it looks like WU series # 13mr11ag 13143.8656.xxxx is what is giving me trouble. Some are running in around 25 minutes and some are taking an hour and 25 minutes. THey are throwing my time to completion all over the place.

Offline Jason G

  • Construction Fraggle
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 8980
Re: x38g reports
« Reply #228 on: 18 Jul 2011, 03:53:47 pm »
... THey are throwing my time to completion all over the place.

Hmmm, maybe it's time to think about reviving/extending my modified boinc with per Application DCFs....

Ghost0210

  • Guest
Re: x38g reports
« Reply #229 on: 18 Jul 2011, 03:56:21 pm »
Can I slap ghost?  I had a great post all ready and when I hit post it gave me the message about a new post and ate my post!!!   >:(

LoL  ;D

Offline perryjay

  • Knight Templar
  • ****
  • Posts: 427
Re: x38g reports
« Reply #230 on: 18 Jul 2011, 03:59:24 pm »
This is one of the long ones http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=2000429739  and this is one of the short ones  http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=2000429745 No idea what is happening to the run time.


Oh, and all I had to do was hit the post button again. I hit my back button without checking to make sure the post had gone through.
« Last Edit: 18 Jul 2011, 04:01:29 pm by perryjay »

Offline Jason G

  • Construction Fraggle
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 8980
Re: x38g reports
« Reply #231 on: 18 Jul 2011, 04:03:11 pm »
This is one of the long ones http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=2000429739  and this is one of the short ones  http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=2000429745 No idea what is happening to the run time.

Were you running the longer one alongside Raistmer's OpenCL APs ?  You could try use Fred's priority thingy, or Process Lasso or similar to jack up the priority on the Cuda app.  Doing other stuff on the machine ?

You get any sticky downclocks still?  How's the temperatures etc ?

Jason

Offline perryjay

  • Knight Templar
  • ****
  • Posts: 427
Re: x38g reports
« Reply #232 on: 18 Jul 2011, 04:10:42 pm »
Temp is 69c, no sticky down clocks, and I was running Raistmers' app at the same time for both of them. I'm only running one MB and one AP on my GPU so it would finish like the short one then do the long one. That or a couple of short ones in a row then a long one. I've mostly been changing the unroll on his app trying to find a sweet spot but it doesn't seem to matter as to how fast or slow the MBs are.

Offline Raistmer

  • Working Code Wizard
  • Volunteer Developer
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 14349
Re: x38g reports
« Reply #233 on: 18 Jul 2011, 04:48:45 pm »
I've mostly been changing the unroll on his app trying to find a sweet spot but it doesn't seem to matter as to how fast or slow the MBs are.
But it can matter. Different unrolls take different amount of GPU memory. So, at least different memory layouts for CUDA app. And with higher unrolls it can have memory shortage...

Offline perryjay

  • Knight Templar
  • ****
  • Posts: 427
Re: x38g reports
« Reply #234 on: 18 Jul 2011, 05:14:11 pm »
I've been keeping an eye on the times as I make the changes if I change while a WU is running then I watch how fast it was running as compared to what it does after the change. I've also made the change before the WU runs and compare it to another run before the change. The longer WUs seemed to pause for a minute or two even though the elapsed time kept climbing. It didn't seem to have anything to do with what the AP app was doing. This without me doing any piddling around.

Offline perryjay

  • Knight Templar
  • ****
  • Posts: 427
Re: x38g reports
« Reply #235 on: 20 Jul 2011, 10:02:21 am »
This one finally decided it had enough.  http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=771323139


This one is interesting to me. http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=766554061  The first guy is running 32f but the third guy takes anonymous platform seriously.  I can't figure out what version he is running.
« Last Edit: 20 Jul 2011, 10:20:09 am by perryjay »

Offline Claggy

  • Alpha Tester
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • ***
  • Posts: 3111
    • My computers at Seti Beta
Re: x38g reports
« Reply #236 on: 20 Jul 2011, 04:30:22 pm »
This one is interesting to me. http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=766554061  The first guy is running 32f but the third guy takes anonymous platform seriously.  I can't figure out what version he is running.
That is Stock 6.08, but running under Anonymous Platform,

Claggy

Offline perryjay

  • Knight Templar
  • ****
  • Posts: 427
Re: x38g reports
« Reply #237 on: 20 Jul 2011, 08:22:39 pm »

Offline Jason G

  • Construction Fraggle
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 8980
Re: x38g reports
« Reply #238 on: 20 Jul 2011, 08:31:15 pm »
Another invalid for me.  http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=781130909

Hmm, you overflowed on that with pulses for no outwardly obvious reason.  Watch those temperatures  ;).  I've decided to put some level of monitoring of that within future applications, so you'll be caught red handed cooking your GPU  :D

Offline perryjay

  • Knight Templar
  • ****
  • Posts: 427
Re: x38g reports
« Reply #239 on: 21 Jul 2011, 09:09:31 am »
Couple of things going on around that time. I believe I was still running my higher over clock and playing with Raistmers' app. Possibly running one of his and two of yours or some such as that. Temps have always held pretty much to a safe range so I'm not too worried about that. Figure I pretty much did that invalid myself by fiddling.
 around.

 

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?
Members
Total Members: 97
Latest: ToeBee
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 59559
Total Topics: 1672
Most Online Today: 226
Most Online Ever: 983
(20 Jan 2020, 03:17:55 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 25
Total: 25
Powered by EzPortal