Forum > Linux

Which Linux?

<< < (3/3)

Dirk Sadowski:
Hello Simon!

About the Memory and Cache...
The infos comes from the S@H page...
Maybe itīs not correct there...


Please, donīt make me worry! ;)

When I look in Konqueror, then I have:
Linux 2.6.16.13-4-default x86_64 (maybe itīs like this, because there is a little space after "default" ;) )
SUSE LINUX 10.1 (x86-64)
The DVD was a "present" in the magazin "cīt specail Linux"...
32 and 64 Bit- full versions ...

And in the installation I became the question: 32 or 64 Bit...? :)

It gives a special Linux Version for AMDs?

Greetings!

PS. When it will be the 32 Bit LINUX, the special Boinc 64 Bit and the S@H 64 Bit Versions does not run, or?



EDIT:

Linux dhcppc0 2.6.16.13-4-default #1 Wed May 3 04:53:23 UTC 2006 x86_64 x86_64 x 86_64 GNU/Linux


processor       : 0
vendor_id       : AuthenticAMD
cpu family      : 15
model           : 12
model name      : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+
stepping        : 0
cpu MHz         : 2200.000
cache size      : 512 KB (then itīs like this that Windows showed me the double of the real KB?)
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 1
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext lm 3dnowext 3dnow
bogomips        : 4432.29
TLB size        : 1024 4K pages
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts fid vid ttp

Simon:
From what you said, it does look like you have 64-bit Linux installed all right :)

About your second question, no, if you have 32-bit Linux you can not run 64-bit applications.

However - if you have 64-bit Linux, you can run all 32-bit applications if you have the compatibility libraries installed (should be there by default).

Regards,
Simon.

Dirk Sadowski:
Hello!

Again, thanks for your support!



The last time I started Boinc with only:
./boinc -return_results_immediately

For around one hour a WU was uploaded but not reported...

It will be in the future?
Because I started Boinc with "return_results_immediately"...

There is no other command that the uploaded results will be reported "now"?

Greetings!


PS. When I would like to stop Boinc, then I close "only" the console?
When I close Boinc, and some WUs are uploaded but not reported, they will be reported in the next run of Boinc?
Because when I start Boinc I can only stop it. I cannot do for example a Benchmark- run before closing the console...

Dirk Sadowski:
Hello!

Update: I have my first reported result (completed WU) with Suse LINUX 10.1- 64Bit! (boinc5.4.9seti5.13-linux-x86_64)


I think I had lose my first result to report... :(

But when I compare it with "Windows SSE2 V5.12 by Crunch3r" itīs 58 minutes slower... :(
(WU ar=0.393930)
Ohh, I thought, 64 Bit will be so very fast that you cannot follow with your eyes the text on the screen from the completed results...! ;)

How I can do it, to let it run with a minimum of losing performance?
Not with Suse, or yes, but not with KDF, but with only a text- screen?

Greetings!

PS. On the results- overview, I cannot see the name of the app and so on... :(
Itīs not like with your (Simons) apps...


EDIT:
When I start BOINC only with: ./boinc -return_results_immediately

The uploaded WUs will be reported with the ask for new work...
Not immediately... :(

So now I think I didnīt lose any WUs... :)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

Go to full version