Seti@Home optimized science apps and information
Optimized Seti@Home apps => Discussion Forum => Topic started by: Aragon Speed on 05 May 2007, 02:52:20 pm
-
Have you guys ever thought of branching out and optimising other boinc projects?
I was thinking that some of the other main projects would benefit from your expertise. (Rosetta springs to mind.)
-
No other project is open source, and IMO no other project is nearly as worthy.
Joe
-
No other project is open source
My bad. ::)
I assumed that all bionic projects were open source by definition. Ah well.
-
No other project is open source, and IMO no other project is nearly as worthy.
Joe
That's not quite true.
Nanohive@home is open source and Leiden Classical offers source too. Also there is Roseta@home, you have to ask the rosetta administration to get the source.
Of course there's still the question of what is to be considered worthy...
-
Well as Rosetta is trying to find cures for cancer, HIV and others, I think that might rank fairly high on the worthiness scale :D
-
Well as Rosetta is trying to find cures for cancer, HIV and others, I think that might rank fairly high on the worthiness scale :D
Same as Simap, WCG proteins@home, predictor@home Folding@home etc... (and hundreds of the same kind before)
As to now nothing usefull found at all. IMO i really don't need the hassle with rosetta@home at all, some other guys allready got the source (i think "who?" and someone from AMD). So let them figure out how to optimize it.
-
Well as Rosetta is trying to find cures for cancer, HIV and others, I think that might rank fairly high on the worthiness scale :D
Same as Simap, WCG proteins@home, predictor@home Folding@home etc... (and hundreds of the same kind before)
As to now nothing usefull found at all. IMO i really don't need the hassle with rosetta@home at all, some other guys allready got the source (i think "who?" and someone from AMD). So let them figure out how to optimize it.
Sounds like a plan to me :)