Ah! Thanks ... now how to read this?<stderr_txt>setiathome_CUDA: Found 1 CUDA device(s): Device 1 : GeForce GT 240 totalGlobalMem = 497745920 sharedMemPerBlock = 16384 regsPerBlock = 16384 warpSize = 32 memPitch = 2147483647 maxThreadsPerBlock = 512 clockRate = 1750000 totalConstMem = 65536 major = 1 minor = 2 textureAlignment = 256 deviceOverlap = 1 multiProcessorCount = 12 setiathome_CUDA: CUDA Device 1 specified, checking... Device 1: GeForce GT 240 is okay
SETI@home using CUDA accelerated device GeForce GT 240V12 modification by Raistmer
Priority of worker thread rised successfullyPriority of process adjusted successfullyTotal GPU memory 497745920 free GPU memory 477425664setiathome_enhanced 6.02 Visual Studio/Microsoft C++Build features: Non-graphics CUDA VLAR autokill enabled FFTW USE_SSE x86 CPUID: AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor Cache: L1=64K L2=512KCPU features: FPU TSC PAE CMPXCHG8B APIC SYSENTER MTRR CMOV/CCMP MMX FXSAVE/FXRSTOR SSE SSE2 HT SSE3 libboinc: 6.3.22Work Unit Info:...............WU true angle range is : 0.420137After app init: total GPU memory 497745920 free GPU memory 477425664Unhandled Exception Detected...- Unhandled Exception Record -Reason: Breakpoint Encountered (0x80000003) at address 0x75BA22A1Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger...
Were thise work units moved from gpu to CPU???
See this.......http://boincfaq.mundayweb.com/index.php?language=1&view=480Also more info available when Seti forums come back online. See the forums there.Were thise work units moved from gpu to CPU???
Ah! Thanks ... now how to read this?<stderr_txt>setiathome_CUDA: Found 1 CUDA device(s):... </stderr_txt>
<message> - exit code -12 (0xfffffff4)</message>
<exit_status>-12</exit_status>
Also, have a look just a couple of lines above <stderr.txt>. If Carola's right, you should see<message> - exit code -12 (0xfffffff4)</message>and a few lines above that, <exit_status>-12</exit_status>If you see any other number, let us know: I must say, my first instinct on reading your initial report that they happened at the exact same second was that it might be a return of the -177s, but only you can tell until the servers are back up.
My first reaction is that they are -177 since they all occured at the same instant during processing. That was also my experience with the -177 errors.
Damn it - just found some "Computation Error" for CPU units too. 5 WUs. All at the EXACT same time.Is this an indication for -177 errors?By the way: What exactly is this -177 error?
You need to be certain exactly what they are - search client_state, don't just rely on our speculation.