Forum > Windows
Can someone confirm this?
Fredericx51:
Sorry, I've posted a Out Off Topic ::)
My WIN XP64 CUDA (2x GTS250) host received only a few, probably Einstein was ahead, LTD, IMO.
And my ATI host received lots of CUDA compute capable MB WU's, which are now done by Q6600 CPU.
But the host did receive ~40, maybe some more, AP WU's, which is absolutely fabulous, for testing and
processing these, cause SETI MB (Optimized SSSE3), Docking, MW and Leiden, are running together.
Collatz C. is still on n.n.tasks.
Will do a test, offline, with a few AP & CC WU's.
AP WU's are running OK, taking 2.5 - 5.5 hours runtime.
sunu:
--- Quote from: Richard Haselgrove on 15 Jun 2010, 02:16:56 pm ---
--- Quote from: sunu on 15 Jun 2010, 01:56:01 pm ---I'm not seeing this. Since this saga began, my pc downloads 100 or so workunits every day and then stops with quota reached.
--- End quote ---
That's interesting. What version, exactly, is it downloading for? (stock/anon, OS, platform, bits - anything you can thnk of).
--- End quote ---
I see this on my linux machine with AKv8 and crunc3r's cuda app. Of course fully anon platform. And I think I see this also on my other winxp machine with gtx470 running jason's x19, again fully anon platform. And I get, in both of them, the stupid message about non usable app_info.xml.
Another strange thing is that the message says about a quota of 100 tasks while on Berkeley's pages the linux machine says a quota of 64/day and the winxp machine 97/day.
Richard Haselgrove:
--- Quote from: sunu on 15 Jun 2010, 04:40:05 pm ---I see this on my linux machine with AKv8 and crunc3r's cuda app. Of course fully anon platform. And I think I see this also on my other winxp machine with gtx470 running jason's x19, again fully anon platform. And I get, in both of them, the stupid message about non usable app_info.xml.
--- End quote ---
I've got no point of comparison for the Linux platform. But the WinXP, if confirmed, would contradict my observation, and hence destroy the hypothesis. Could you possibly confirm when you first reached the '100 quota' message?
--- Quote from: sunu on 15 Jun 2010, 04:40:05 pm ---Another strange thing is that the message says about a quota of 100 tasks while on Berkeley's pages the linux machine says a quota of 64/day and the winxp machine 97/day.
--- End quote ---
This one, at least, is easy. Beta also showed the obsolete version of the quota until I complained to DA, and he (very quickly) knocked up the replacement 'Application Info' pages for Beta. They just haven't migrated across to the main project yet - unless they appear after the outage.
sunu:
--- Quote from: Richard Haselgrove on 15 Jun 2010, 05:18:47 pm ---I've got no point of comparison for the Linux platform. But the WinXP, if confirmed, would contradict my observation, and hence destroy the hypothesis. Could you possibly confirm when you first reached the '100 quota' message?
--- End quote ---
I don't remember exactly, I guess the first day the crappy server code was on? A gtx 470 burns more than 100 workunits a day.
sunu:
This picture is from today. It got 100 tasks and then the usual, by now, reached 100 tasks quota message.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version