Forum > Discussion Forum

When corrupted results get validated...

<< < (12/21) > >>

Richard Haselgrove:

--- Quote from: Richard Haselgrove on 16 Jun 2010, 07:16:20 pm ---The reason is it was reported on 7 February. I don't see how you can call that "again": I would accept "still". It's those AWOL wingmates who stopped any work happening from January to April that we should be concerned about.

--- End quote ---


--- Quote from: sunu on 16 Jun 2010, 08:29:04 pm ---No, it got invalidated after that June 12 (or maybe 16) result. Before that date it wasn't in my invalid list.

--- End quote ---

It wouldn't even have been looked at until 12 June. When that second 'success' report came in, the validator will have tried to find the uploaded result file that should have preceded the 7 February report - and presunably it wasn't there.

Without a result file, that one could never be validated: presumably the file associated with the 12 June report was findable, but there was nothing to compare it with, hence 'inconclusive' and 'pending'.

sunu:
Why it wasn't there?

Claggy:
I had a look at the list of hosts i posted earlier in this thread, some of the Fermi's are still trying to do Cuda23 work and don't have the Fermi app,
then there's smithwr3 who still using the optimised V12 app.

Claggy

Edit: I retract that, i was talking out of my A*se, they had done Cuda23 work at the beginning of June, and haven't done any since.

Claggy:
Got a false Invalid task today, wingmen are smithwr3 and Fabio Chimienti, both running V12 still, both produced -9's,  :(

wuid=646519895

Claggy

perryjay:
That smithwr has 18,000 tasks on his list. It's scary thinking how many of those are returning -9.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page