Forum > Discussion Forum
When corrupted results get validated...
Raistmer:
--- Quote from: _heinz on 06 Jun 2010, 10:21:27 am ---It is to mention, I get no work for fermi application since yesterday.
All wu's are coming are for cpu only.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I think it is blocked till the situation is solved.
:)
--- End quote ---
Hard but probably correct decision from Berkeley's side. Hope they will be able to solve this soon cause all they need id to follow Richard's suggestion about 6.10 on main.
Looks not very hard to do actually.
Richard Haselgrove:
It's not blocked, because I've got four new tasks today. But I think it may be very severely throttled.
Raistmer, people on the main board are still recommending your V12b_FERMI. Has anybody actually tested it, and posted any results? If not, I've just downloaded a copy and I'll run a bench when the 470 is free (GPUGrid task due to finish in ~2 hours). If it doesn't work, as you suggested last night, I suggest you remove the download archive.
Raistmer:
--- Quote from: Richard Haselgrove on 06 Jun 2010, 10:37:24 am ---It's not blocked, because I've got four new tasks today. But I think it may be very severely throttled.
Raistmer, people on the main board are still recommending your V12b_FERMI. Has anybody actually tested it, and posted any results? If not, I've just downloaded a copy and I'll run a bench when the 470 is free (GPUGrid task due to finish in ~2 hours). If it doesn't work, as you suggested last night, I suggest you remove the download archive.
--- End quote ---
AFAIK Todd Hebert tested it and found uncompatible with FERMI.
It was at the beginning of corresponding thread.
Later this info somehow modified... So better do short test and close this topic completely. Surely I will remove it if it not compatible indeed.
Richard Haselgrove:
Ran the bench with a range of Joe's full-length WUs. One of them worked, but three failures: given the ARs involved, I think this needs withdrawing, pronto. Could you remove the archive, please, and get the Mods to lock your thread after a suitable explanation?
While it was running, I looked through Todd Hebert's posts. He says a couple of times that he got the files from you, and even posts an app_info for MB_6.09_CUDA_V12b_FERMI.exe (message 990059). But I don't see anywhere where he posts, or even describes, a test result advising a change of direction. Yet other people, like ScimanStev, describe downloading files from Todd which - it turns out - have the stock app included.
I can't say I'm very impressed by the integrity of this process.
Raistmer:
--- Quote from: Richard Haselgrove on 06 Jun 2010, 01:18:19 pm ---Ran the bench with a range of Joe's full-length WUs. One of them worked, but three failures: given the ARs involved, I think this needs withdrawing, pronto. Could you remove the archive, please, and get the Mods to lock your thread after a suitable explanation?
While it was running, I looked through Todd Hebert's posts. He says a couple of times that he got the files from you, and even posts an app_info for MB_6.09_CUDA_V12b_FERMI.exe (message 990059). But I don't see anywhere where he posts, or even describes, a test result advising a change of direction. Yet other people, like ScimanStev, describe downloading files from Todd which - it turns out - have the stock app included.
I can't say I'm very impressed by the integrity of this process.
--- End quote ---
Ok, I will recommend to use stock 6.10 from beta then.
EDIT: done.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version