Forum > Windows
New version of the CPUID program
talaktalan:
Here is the output for an oldie, it's neither Intel nor AMD ;D :
CPUID
-tag: 'CyrixInstead'
-fullname: ''
Computed name: 'Cyrix 6x86MX 6x86MX (MII)'
-notes:
cpus cores hyperT =threads L1 L2 L3 code
1 * 1 * 1 = 1 16K 0K 0K 16K
family-model Brand Extd:family-model Brand [10-04a]
6-0-0 43 00-0 000
features: mmx
cpuid -eax- -ebx- -ecx- -edx-
0..0 00000001 69727943 64616574 736E4978
0..1 00000600 69727943 00000000 0080A135
8..0 [CPU doesn't have xtd ID]
< Press [enter] for memory speed >
Speed= 249 Mhz
Test : L1 L2 RAM
8 ints: 964 33 741 - Reads
8 ints: 128 33 322 - Writes
8 mmx: 1513 33 1517 - Reads
8 mmx: 289 33 346 - Writes
pre-cache: 33 33 33 - Reads
not-cached: 33 33 33 - Writes
< Press [enter] key to close >
There is, however, an error in the data: This cpu has a 64 KB unified L1 cache, not 16KB L1 data + 16KB L1 code as listed in the output. The other information should be correct. Maybe the doubled 6x86MX in the 'Computed name' output is a bit odd. This cpu was called Cyrix MII PR333 (by Cyrix) and IBM 6x86MX PR333 (by IBM), I have the IBM version here, but afaik only the package is different.
Regards
Alex
[attachment deleted by admin]
[attachment deleted by admin]
troythewdblue:
CPUID
-tag: 'AuthenticAMD'
-fullname: 'AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3800+'
Computed name: 'AMD K8 Athlon 64 (Venice)'
-notes: XX00+
cpus cores hyperT =threads L1 L2 L3 code
1 * 1 * 1 = 1 64K 512K 0K 64K
family-model Brand Extd:family-model Brand [10-04a]
F-F-2 42F 00-2 110
features: mmx 3Dnow 3Dnow+ sse sse2 sse3 em64t
cpuid -eax- -ebx- -ecx- -edx-
0..0 00000001 68747541 444D4163 69746E65
0..1 00020FF2 00000800 00000001 078BFBFF
8..0 80000018 68747541 444D4163 69746E65
8..1 00020FF2 00000110 00000001 E3D3FBFF
8..2 20444D41 6C687441 74286E6F 3620296D
8..3 72502034 7365636F 20726F73 30303833
8..4 0000002B 00000000 00000000 00000000
8..5 FF08FF08 FF20FF20 40020140 40020140
8..6 00000000 42004200 02008140 00000000
it is actuly 2 64 kb l1 cache for total of 128 only shows 64
dkenny:
My copy of the cpuid run for my system is attached.
[attachment deleted by admin]
v4wheelman:
Good Day !
A BIG thank you to those who take the time to write, publish and support optomized applications. Great work !!!
I am running an optomized Seti App ... details below. My computer is not in the list and I am submitting it here. Is there any chance there will be an SSE3 app for AMD processors?
CPUID
-tag: 'AuthenticAMD'
-fullname: 'AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52'
Computed name: 'AMD K8 Opteron 8 (Sledgehammer)'
-notes: YY HE
cpus cores hyperT =threads L1 L2 L3 code
1 * 2 * 1 = 2 64K 512K 0K 64K
family-model Brand Extd:family-model Brand [10-04a]
F-8-2 1648 00-4 597
features: mmx 3Dnow 3Dnow+ sse sse2 sse3 em64t
cpuid -eax- -ebx- -ecx- -edx-
0..0 00000001 68747541 444D4163 69746E65
0..1 00040F82 01020800 00002001 178BFBFF
8..0 80000018 68747541 444D4163 69746E65
8..1 00040F82 00000597 0000001F EBD3FBFF
8..2 20444D41 69727554 74286E6F 3620296D
8..3 32582034 626F4D20 20656C69 68636554
8..4 6F6C6F6E 54207967 32352D4C 00000000
8..5 FF08FF08 FF20FF20 40020140 40020140
8..6 00000000 42004200 02008140 00000000
< Press [enter] for memory speed >
Speed=1607 Mhz
Test : L1 L2 RAM
8 ints: 8839 4496 2266 - Reads
8 ints: 10753 4153 1746 - Writes
8 sse: 12134 6372 2521 - Reads
8 sse: 12184 5999 1969 - Writes
pre-cache: 33 33 2651 - Reads
not-cached: 33 33 1933 - Writes
< Press [enter] key to close >
<core_client_version>5.8.8</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
Optimized SETI@Home Enhanced application
Optimizers: Ben Herndon, Josef Segur, Alex Kan, Simon Zadra
Version: Windows SSE2 32-bit 'Ni!' based on seti V5.15 'Chicken Good!'
Rev: (R-2.0|QxW|FFT:IPP_SSE2|Ben-Joe)
CPUID: 'AMD K8 Opteron 8 (Sledgehammer)'
cpus: 1 cores: 2 threads: 1 cache: L1=64K L2=512K L3=0K
features: mmx 3Dnow 3Dnow+ sse sse2 sse3
speed: 1607 MHz -- read megs/sec: L1=8805, L2=4442, RAM=2399
BenHer:
Ok...
Now I've gotten a version of CPUID to work with an external identification table.
(note it still has an internal table, and will use that if external table file is not in same directory)
This version has no checksum or md5 checking to see if the external file is valid...which is good for this test in case some end user can update the table for a new CPU and send me a working update.
The version which will be put into seti cruncher (and maybe boinc eventually) will have some protections against being modified.
Now I have to look through all the postings here and elsewhere about mis-identification and update the table wtih those newer CPUs. Once I have that I will probably post something.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version