Forum > Windows
SETI at HOME Enhanced V6.09 (CUDA 23)
ScitechGrid:
v6.09 running well on my GTX275 + Win XP
Geek@Play:
In this message http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=54288&nowrap=true#992283
Near the bottom of this message is shown the app_info file that was created for this person by the v .35 installer. There are two sections labled for version 608. One is for plan_class cuda and the other is for plan_class cuda 23. Is the stated version 608 correct for both sections?
I thought version 609 equated to plan_class cuda 23 or am I wrong?
Richard Haselgrove:
--- Quote from: Geek@Play on 07 May 2010, 07:23:15 am ---
In this message http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=54288&nowrap=true#992283
Near the bottom of this message is shown the app_info file that was created for this person by the v .35 installer. There are two sections labled for version 608. One is for plan_class cuda and the other is for plan_class cuda 23. Is the stated version 608 correct for both sections?
I thought version 609 equated to plan_class cuda 23 or am I wrong?
--- End quote ---
As far at the SETI project itself is concerned, it really doesn't matter at all. Yes, if you run the stock applications, 608/cuda and 609/cuda23 is the way it'll turn out: but for people who use app_info, a show-stopper can be that Marius's ReScheduler application will only operate on tasks with a '608' version number. Until Marius can find the time to post an updated version, or let someone else have the source code to make the changes for him, they're stuck. Tagging everything with v608 is the lesser of two evils.
Geek@Play:
Thanks for the info Richard..............
Marius:
--- Quote from: Richard Haselgrove on 07 May 2010, 07:32:50 am ---
--- Quote from: Geek@Play on 07 May 2010, 07:23:15 am ---
In this message http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=54288&nowrap=true#992283
Near the bottom of this message is shown the app_info file that was created for this person by the v .35 installer. There are two sections labled for version 608. One is for plan_class cuda and the other is for plan_class cuda 23. Is the stated version 608 correct for both sections?
I thought version 609 equated to plan_class cuda 23 or am I wrong?
--- End quote ---
As far at the SETI project itself is concerned, it really doesn't matter at all. Yes, if you run the stock applications, 608/cuda and 609/cuda23 is the way it'll turn out: but for people who use app_info, a show-stopper can be that Marius's ReScheduler application will only operate on tasks with a '608' version number. Until Marius can find the time to post an updated version, or let someone else have the source code to make the changes for him, they're stuck. Tagging everything with v608 is the lesser of two evils.
--- End quote ---
Interesting and kind of new to me. The rescheduler parses only the client_state.xml and it searches for all workunit with plan_class items to know if a unit is for cpu or gpu. It does not expect the new plan_class "cuda23", so everything marked for plan_class cuda23 (609) will internally be seen as a standard cuda application (no matter what version_num is specified).
Since i no longer have a nvidia at home, does somebody have an example client_state.xml with multiple plan_classes so i can take a look and test? (please email me at marius66 at home dot nl)
Thanks in advance,
Marius
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version