Forum > GPU crunching

Unified installer add flops

<< < (6/7) > >>

Claggy:

--- Quote from: Richard Haselgrove on 07 Dec 2009, 04:40:08 am ---
--- Quote from: Claggy on 06 Dec 2009, 08:27:42 pm ---DA has added COPROCS to HOST_INFO Changeset 19797

Claggy

Edit: and after Changeset 19798 get_host_info() GUI RPC now contains GPU info


--- End quote ---

No reply to my question on boinc_alpha, but it obviously had the desired effect!

I'll grab one as soon as there's a build available, and let you see it so you can decide if it's any use.

--- End quote ---

Boinc 6.10.22 released:

boinc_6.10.22_windows_intelx86.exe

boinc_6.10.22_windows_x86_64.exe

Claggy

Edit: Installed 6.10.22_x86 on my laptop, Boinc reports a GPU on start up, but no GPU work runs, and project computer details no longer show a GPU.
Edit 2: Installed 6.10.22_64 on my Desktop PC, same, Boinc reports a GPU, but GPU tasks don't start, just show waiting to run,
Reported to Boinc_Alpha list, DA's looking into it.

Claggy:

--- Quote from: Richard Haselgrove on 07 Dec 2009, 04:40:08 am ---
--- Quote from: Claggy on 06 Dec 2009, 08:27:42 pm ---DA has added COPROCS to HOST_INFO Changeset 19797

Claggy

Edit: and after Changeset 19798 get_host_info() GUI RPC now contains GPU info


--- End quote ---

No reply to my question on boinc_alpha, but it obviously had the desired effect!

I'll grab one as soon as there's a build available, and let you see it so you can decide if it's any use.
--- End quote ---

Boinc 6.10.23 released:

boinc_6.10.23_windows_intelx86.exe

boinc_6.10.23_windows_x86_64.exe

Claggy

Edit: this version's no better:

09/12/2009 00:45:31 Collatz Conjecture Application uses missing NVIDIA GPU
09/12/2009 00:45:31 Collatz Conjecture Missing coprocessor for task collatz_1259356581_147128_0

arkayn:
Looks like I will stick with 6.10.21 for the time being then.

Richard Haselgrove:
There's a v6.10.24 now, which does seem to work.

Here's the host_info output (my formatting):


--- Code: ---<coprocs>
<coproc_cuda>
<count> 1 </count>
<name> GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ </name>
<req_secs> 0 </req_secs>
<req_instances> 0 </req_instances>
<estimated_delay> 0 </estimated_delay>
<drvVersion> 19038 </drvVersion>
<cudaVersion> 2030 </cudaVersion>
<totalGlobalMem> 536543232 </totalGlobalMem>
<sharedMemPerBlock> 16384 </sharedMemPerBlock>
<regsPerBlock> 8192 </regsPerBlock>
<warpSize> 32 </warpSize>
<memPitch> 262144 </memPitch>
<maxThreadsPerBlock> 512 </maxThreadsPerBlock>
<maxThreadsDim> 512 512 64 </maxThreadsDim>
<maxGridSize> 65535 65535 1 </maxGridSize>
<totalConstMem> 65536 </totalConstMem>
<major> 1 </major>
<minor> 1 </minor>
<clockRate> 1890000 </clockRate>
<textureAlignment> 256 </textureAlignment>
<deviceOverlap> 1 </deviceOverlap>
<multiProcessorCount> 16 </multiProcessorCount>
</coproc_cuda>
</coprocs>
--- End code ---

Shame about <req_secs>, <req_instances>, and <estimated_delay> - they belong with work fetch, not host info: but it's easier to ignore something unneeded, rather than invent something missing.

Jason G:
Hmm, same info as from the Cuda api device query function, (naturally I suppose).  No need to use that particular RPC then.  quite useful for a gui frontend/manager such that it wouldn't have to call cuda api though.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page