Forum > Windows
Is anybody developing SETI opp app for CAL (ATI GPU)??
Triumph:
Just in time for me to try it out finally!
I expect to be able to give some feedback on beta in a short while 8)
DLukenbill:
--- Quote from: arkayn on 18 Oct 2009, 12:44:16 pm ---Not yet as OpenCL is still not mature enough.
--- End quote ---
Will the switch to OpenCL help with the 9.2/large array problem? What are the long-term plans regarding the large array problem?
Raistmer:
--- Quote from: DLukenbill on 19 Oct 2009, 03:31:21 pm ---
--- Quote from: arkayn on 18 Oct 2009, 12:44:16 pm ---Not yet as OpenCL is still not mature enough.
--- End quote ---
Will the switch to OpenCL help with the 9.2/large array problem? What are the long-term plans regarding the large array problem?
--- End quote ---
OpenCL probably will be free of this limitation. In any case it should be asked on ATI site, not here.
MarkJ:
Another stupid quest, but given i'm not that familiar with CAL/Brook+ or cuda...
Isn't it possible to get an existing fft library (source) and compile that using the cal/brook+ compiler to get yourself a fft library that will work with ati. Assuming you could get it compiled of course. This would then allow MB and AP port to use ati card.
Raistmer:
--- Quote from: MarkJ on 20 Oct 2009, 08:19:21 am ---Another stupid quest, but given i'm not that familiar with CAL/Brook+ or cuda...
Isn't it possible to get an existing fft library (source) and compile that using the cal/brook+ compiler to get yourself a fft library that will work with ati. Assuming you could get it compiled of course. This would then allow MB and AP port to use ati card.
--- End quote ---
No, it's not possible.
Brook+ in not C++. It even not C. It's some small subset of C with GPU-specific extensions. Can you compile pascal or basic sources with C++ Intel compiler for example ? Same case here.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version