...I am coming back up from 270.48 that I installed trying to find the desktop bug I am still seeing.
How about 280?
I might end up loading that one once I finish rebuilding my AMD machine, I think I will end up with a mixed GPU environment for testing purposes. Primary will be my ATI HD5830 and the GTX560 will go in the second slot.
Installed 280.26 on two of my Win 7 64 machines with GTX 295.One produced a BSOD or hang ever couple of hours and produced Seti errors. Back to 280.26 no problems yet.Other one produced no errors but only about 16 second runtime before it finished (Seti enhanced), with an extremely high CPU load of 100%, more than normal.I already noticed the RAC going down on that machine.....Did a restart, that didn't solve a thing.Back to 208.26 and it works just fine.Using the latest Lunatics installer.
Other one produced no errors but only about 16 second runtime before it finished (Seti enhanced), with an extremely high CPU load of 100%, more than normal.
I already noticed the RAC going down on that machine.....
When i tested the preview version of Cat 11.8, OpenCL apps consumed lots of CPU time, just like Cat 11.7, and the Nvidia 27x.xx and later drivers,Claggy
Quote from: benool on 15 Aug 2011, 04:08:02 amHow about 280? considerably better I'm told