Forum > Linux
Linux x64 AP v5.05
Urs Echternacht:
--- Quote from: Tye on 23 Aug 2009, 09:36:58 am ---
On the AMD client, I get mostly good runs, one error. But, they all had very low claimed credit:
Task ID
click for details
Show names Work unit ID
click for details Sent Time reported
or deadline
explain Status Run time (sec) claimed credit granted credit
6627643 2282517 19 Aug 2009 23:36:57 UTC 20 Aug 2009 0:08:22 UTC Completed, validation inconclusive 1,286.88 3.13 pending
6627635 2282513 19 Aug 2009 23:28:59 UTC 20 Aug 2009 0:02:44 UTC Completed, waiting for validation 396.70 0.97 pending
6627619 2282505 19 Aug 2009 23:13:26 UTC 19 Aug 2009 23:28:59 UTC Completed, validation inconclusive 161.91 0.38 pending
6627609 2282500 20 Aug 2009 0:08:22 UTC 14 Sep 2009 0:08:22 UTC In progress --- --- ---
6627595 2282493 20 Aug 2009 0:02:44 UTC 20 Aug 2009 9:14:29 UTC Completed, waiting for validation 291.70 0.68 pending
6627490 2282443 19 Aug 2009 23:16:42 UTC 19 Aug 2009 23:36:57 UTC Completed, validation inconclusive 636.87 1.55 pending
6624580 2281948 17 Aug 2009 21:22:49 UTC 18 Aug 2009 15:26:25 UTC Error while computing 2,295.81 8.93 8.93
--- End quote ---
[/size]
Are you sure you had the optimized version running on that error. I have checked the task id :
--- Code: ---<core_client_version>6.6.11</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process got signal 11
</message>
<stderr_txt>
In ap_gfx_main.cpp: in ap_graphics_init(): Starting client.
In ap_client_main.cpp: in mainloop(): at dm_chunk_large 896
In ap_client_main.cpp: in mainloop(): at dm_chunk_large 1024
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
</stderr_txt>
]]>
--- End code ---
This is the stock astropulse 5.06 application having an error not the optimized one. All of your results, Tye, look like that.
If you have problems with the installation instructions that were included in the optimized package, please ask for help in this forum. There are a few people here that can assist you through the installation process.
The low claimed credts are due to very low runtimes because of early finishing with "Found 30 single pulses and 30 repeating pulses, exiting."
Tye:
You're right - that was 2 days before I switched. The others should be with the new client, or at least the ones 20 Aug and later. It shows up in top and ps with the correct client and has since I installed it. Hmmm. I'll check more after work tonight.
Tye:
Aha, it turned out I hadn't completed any yet. Just submitted one right now manually and it looks good:
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/result.php?resultid=6627609
Urs Echternacht:
--- Quote from: Tye on 24 Aug 2009, 06:25:15 am ---Aha, it turned out I hadn't completed any yet. Just submitted one right now manually and it looks good:
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/result.php?resultid=6627609
--- End quote ---
Thanks Tye, that one looks indeed like the right thing. :)
lordvader:
I was wondering if the AP issues exist under kernel 2.6.27 ?
Moving to kernel 2.6.30 won't cut it, as CUDA performance in abysmal, and the AP failure rate in 2.6.28 is just horrible.
I haven't tried 2.6.29 though ...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version