Forum > Linux
Linux x64 AP v5.05
lordvader:
I'll try that tomorrow.
At the moment I'm trying the SSE3 version on a 2.6.30 kernel, just wanna make sure that works.
... by other version, you mean the SSE2 only version, correct ? Which kernel ? The 2.6.28 one ?
Urs Echternacht:
--- Quote from: lordvader on 21 Aug 2009, 11:45:22 am ---I'll try that tomorrow.
At the moment I'm trying the SSE3 version on a 2.6.30 kernel, just wanna make sure that works.
... by other version, you mean the SSE2 only version, correct ? Which kernel ? The 2.6.28 one ?
--- End quote ---
If 2.6.30 works for you without errors, that would at least proove that 2.6.28 has to be excluded from support, similar to kernel versions before 2.6.22.
Yes, the AMD64 SSE2 version. If possible, run a few wus on each kernel, to see if there will occur other problems. Thanks in advance.
ps: your first wu has validated. ++
lordvader:
I'll keep posting here, as this seems the more active thread :)
The vanilla 2.6.28 kernel also resulted in errors, so I don't think its an ubuntu thing.
The SSE2 client seemed to work fine, but when I switched back to SSE3, the executable wasn't in the folder, and I lost my cache of AP units !!! Bugger !
I'm going to try the 2.6.31rc6 kernel, with the new nvidia drivers, see if I can hit the middle ground of stable AP, and fast CUDA.
Urs Echternacht:
--- Quote from: lordvader on 22 Aug 2009, 01:01:27 pm ---I'll keep posting here, as this seems the more active thread :)
The vanilla 2.6.28 kernel also resulted in errors, so I don't think its an ubuntu thing.
The SSE2 client seemed to work fine, but when I switched back to SSE3, the executable wasn't in the folder, and I lost my cache of AP units !!! Bugger !
I'm going to try the 2.6.31rc6 kernel, with the new nvidia drivers, see if I can hit the middle ground of stable AP, and fast CUDA.
--- End quote ---
The only reported errors after one week into beta testing are yours (Ubuntu 9.04, kernel version 2.6.28+), lordvader. A big thank you for your efforts.
Anyone else has results to report ?
ps: stock astropulse seems not to play well on that os/kernel, too.
Tye:
On the AMD client, I get mostly good runs, one error. But, they all had very low claimed credit:
Task ID
click for details
Show names Work unit ID
click for details Sent Time reported
or deadline
explain Status Run time (sec) claimed credit granted credit
6627643 2282517 19 Aug 2009 23:36:57 UTC 20 Aug 2009 0:08:22 UTC Completed, validation inconclusive 1,286.88 3.13 pending
6627635 2282513 19 Aug 2009 23:28:59 UTC 20 Aug 2009 0:02:44 UTC Completed, waiting for validation 396.70 0.97 pending
6627619 2282505 19 Aug 2009 23:13:26 UTC 19 Aug 2009 23:28:59 UTC Completed, validation inconclusive 161.91 0.38 pending
6627609 2282500 20 Aug 2009 0:08:22 UTC 14 Sep 2009 0:08:22 UTC In progress --- --- ---
6627595 2282493 20 Aug 2009 0:02:44 UTC 20 Aug 2009 9:14:29 UTC Completed, waiting for validation 291.70 0.68 pending
6627490 2282443 19 Aug 2009 23:16:42 UTC 19 Aug 2009 23:36:57 UTC Completed, validation inconclusive 636.87 1.55 pending
6624580 2281948 17 Aug 2009 21:22:49 UTC 18 Aug 2009 15:26:25 UTC Error while computing 2,295.81 8.93 8.93
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version