Forum > Discussion Forum
Optimized AP 5.03 for Windows and %age blanked
WinyterKnight:
Have now done 5 AP tasks with Opti 5.03 on my Q6600, and noticed crunch time is either 12 hrs (2 tasks) or 14+ hrs (3 tasks).
Looking further I see that the 12 hr tasks have 0% blanked, the others have 76% or more blanked.
Is there any explanation for this or is it the case that the noise inserted in the blanked portions is still not right.
I haven't done any 5.03's with default app, as it wasn't tested on Beta, and I have been trying to clear the 5.00's on main.
Raistmer:
--- Quote from: WinterKnight on 25 Feb 2009, 12:17:39 am ---Have now done 5 AP tasks with Opti 5.03 on my Q6600, and noticed crunch time is either 12 hrs (2 tasks) or 14+ hrs (3 tasks).
Looking further I see that the 12 hr tasks have 0% blanked, the others have 76% or more blanked.
Is there any explanation for this or is it the case that the noise inserted in the blanked portions is still not right.
I haven't done any 5.03's with default app, as it wasn't tested on Beta, and I have been trying to clear the 5.00's on main.
--- End quote ---
Check if your non-blanked fast results have overflows (30 single or 30 repeated pulses or both) ?
WinyterKnight:
Task 1171357741 reports
single pulses: 1
repetitive pulses: 1
percent blanked: 0.00
Task 1171358497 reports
single pulses: 3
repetitive pulses: 1
percent blanked: 0.00
So no, there are no overflows.
Raistmer:
--- Quote from: WinterKnight on 25 Feb 2009, 04:16:42 am ---Task 1171357741 reports
single pulses: 1
repetitive pulses: 1
percent blanked: 0.00
Task 1171358497 reports
single pulses: 3
repetitive pulses: 1
percent blanked: 0.00
So no, there are no overflows.
--- End quote ---
Hm very interesting... There were reports that blanking itself takes pretty small amount of time...
Richard Haselgrove:
Jason and I both saw that slow-processing effect for heavily-blanked WUs in early testing - Raistmer, review the pre-release thread for 13/14 Feb.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version