Forum > Linux

SETI MB CUDA for Linux

<< < (120/162) > >>

riofl:
wish he counted cases as 'spares' as well.. hehe then i wouldnt have to buy anything to build the extra computer once i replace this one.

riofl:
what do you run on your cpus? multibeam or astropulse? do you find astropulse gives higher credit than the equivalent time with MB would?

Raistmer:

--- Quote from: riofl on 24 Jan 2010, 01:10:24 pm ---what do you run on your cpus? multibeam or astropulse? do you find astropulse gives higher credit than the equivalent time with MB would?



--- End quote ---
There is no AP work now at all, so question highly theoretical one  :P

riofl:
ahh .. ok.. guess i will wait to wonder until they bring it back if they do.

thanks

sunu:

--- Quote from: riofl on 24 Jan 2010, 01:10:24 pm ---what do you run on your cpus? multibeam or astropulse? do you find astropulse gives higher credit than the equivalent time with MB would?

--- End quote ---

Well, what raistmer said.
But when astropulse comes back, I don't think there is currently a credit advantage over multibeam. Moreover our Q6600 is not strong enough to support, for example, 4 astropulse workunits plus 1, 2 or more cuda workunits. In that case we would lose RAC.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page