Forum > Linux

SETI MB CUDA for Linux

<< < (78/162) > >>

pp:
You need the 2.2 CUDA binary: http://calbe.dw70.de/mb/viewtopic.php?p=868#p868

vejpuste:

--- Quote from: pp on 25 Aug 2009, 08:45:02 am ---You need the 2.2 CUDA binary: http://calbe.dw70.de/mb/viewtopic.php?p=868#p868

--- End quote ---
I try this application too but here is another problem
ldd setiathome-6.08.CUDA_2.2_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
./setiathome-6.08.CUDA_2.2_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by ./setiathome-6.08.CUDA_2.2_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
CentOS5 have no GLIBCXX_3.4.9 in updates now.
Libor

Urs Echternacht:

--- Quote from: vejpuste on 25 Aug 2009, 08:59:23 am ---
--- Quote from: pp on 25 Aug 2009, 08:45:02 am ---You need the 2.2 CUDA binary: http://calbe.dw70.de/mb/viewtopic.php?p=868#p868

--- End quote ---
I try this application too but here is another problem
ldd setiathome-6.08.CUDA_2.2_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
./setiathome-6.08.CUDA_2.2_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by ./setiathome-6.08.CUDA_2.2_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
CentOS5 have no GLIBCXX_3.4.9 in updates now.
Libor

--- End quote ---
Search for a newer version of "libstdc++", GLIBCXX_3.4.9 is the version number of that library.

lordvader:
... currently trying the 2.6.27 kernel, and CUDA seems fine (and hoping that AP is stable).

Quick question though. I had about 70 WUs uploaded, but not reported. I then tinkered with my app_info.xml, and lost all the WUs, so can't report them ! Is there a way to report with the boinc client ? Otherwise, there's 70 units sitting there, and no one will ever know !!!

Urs Echternacht:

--- Quote from: lordvader on 25 Aug 2009, 11:32:50 am ---... currently trying the 2.6.27 kernel, and CUDA seems fine (and hoping that AP is stable).

Quick question though. I had about 70 WUs uploaded, but not reported. I then tinkered with my app_info.xml, and lost all the WUs, so can't report them ! Is there a way to report with the boinc client ? Otherwise, there's 70 units sitting there, and no one will ever know !!!

--- End quote ---
On main the only way is currently to run your cache dry, detach from project and immediately after reattach to project. That way the "lost" wus will be marked "detached" and send out again.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version