Forum > Discussion Forum

Report on new optimized Astropulse apps for Windows

<< < (18/19) > >>

Richard Haselgrove:

--- Quote from: Jason G on 25 Nov 2008, 07:53:40 am ---
--- Quote from: Haselgrove on 25 Nov 2008, 07:48:55 am ---..
Oh, and please contribute to to my 'dilemma' thread at SETI :-\
..

--- End quote ---

Done.  Feel free to disagree.


--- End quote ---

And now the WU is done, too. I decided to let it run with opti v5.00: it validated the v5.00 stock, and the v4.36 stock got zilch. Not even weakly similar. Similar situation for the first of Geek@Play's dilemma cases, which has now reported. I can't say I'm surprised, but I am disappointed. I very much doubt Eric is likely to waste his holiday weekend writing a manual credit script - and the results will be purged by then, anyway.

Raistmer:
Well, I'm more concerned by the meaning (or meaningless) of current AP work than credits actually...

Leaps-from-Shadows:
Cruiser's compiled results so far:

Main:
368768645 (Validated) - 0.008021076 credits per CPU second
368768653 (Validated) - 0.008183099 credits per CPU second
368496971 (Pending) - 0.008235288 credits per CPU second
368768654 (Validated, canonical result) - 0.008136883 credits per CPU second
368768675 (Pending) - 0.008161555 credits per CPU second
368768681 (Validated) - 0.008024405 credits per CPU second
369656439 (Pending) - 0.007830532 credits per CPU second
349739781 (Validated) - 0.008531656 credits per CPU second
369656217 (Pending) - 0.008278782 credits per CPU second

368418713 (v4.37, Pending) - 0.006726898 credits per CPU second

Beta:
1563494 (Validated) - 0.009484371 credits per CPU second
1565756 (Validated) - 0.009705443 credits per CPU second
1564992 (Validated) - 0.009227865 credits per CPU second
1565745 (Pending) (Task details) - 0.009846161 credits per CPU second
1565021 (Pending) (Task details) - 0.009777995 credits per CPU second
1565898 (Pending) (Task details) - 0.009551190 credits per CPU second
1628888 (Pending) (Task details) - 0.009486180 credits per CPU second

For comparison:
Shorty Multibeam (16.84 credits):  0.007037046 credits per CPU second
Average Multibeam (44.12 credits):  0.008375063 credits per CPU second
Long Multibeam (63.86 credits):  0.010619245 credits per CPU second

Leaps-from-Shadows:
Cruiser's compiled results so far:

Main:
368768645 (Validated) - 0.008021076 credits per CPU second
368768653 (Validated) - 0.008183099 credits per CPU second
368496971 (Pending) - 0.008235288 credits per CPU second
368768654 (Validated) - 0.008136883 credits per CPU second
368768675 (Validated) - 0.008161555 credits per CPU second
368768681 (Validated) - 0.008024405 credits per CPU second
369656439 (Validated) - 0.007830532 credits per CPU second
349739781 (Validated) - 0.008531656 credits per CPU second
369656217 (Pending) - 0.008278782 credits per CPU second
370050505 (Validated) - 0.008334832 credits per CPU second
370050504 (Validated) - 0.008610554 credits per CPU second

368418713 (v4.37, Pending) - 0.006726898 credits per CPU second

Beta:
1563494 (Validated) - 0.009484371 credits per CPU second
1565756 (Validated) - 0.009705443 credits per CPU second
1564992 (Validated) - 0.009227865 credits per CPU second
1565745 (Validated) - 0.009846161 credits per CPU second
1565021 (Pending) (Task details) - 0.009777995 credits per CPU second
1565898 (Pending) (Task details) - 0.009551190 credits per CPU second
1628888 (Validated) - 0.009486180 credits per CPU second
1565146 (Validated) - 0.009490379 credits per CPU second

For comparison:
Shorty Multibeam (16.84 credits):  0.007037046 credits per CPU second
Average Multibeam (44.12 credits):  0.008375063 credits per CPU second
Long Multibeam (63.86 credits):  0.010619245 credits per CPU second

[B^S] zioriga:
Leaps-from-Shadows excuse me, but if you use Vista x64 why don't you use BOINC 6.2.19 64b client ??

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page