Forum > Discussion Forum
Report on new optimized Astropulse apps for Windows
Jason G:
Yep, noticed the nice integer division followed by typecast to double. Always did find 32 bit long & normal signed ints funny (or the contexts I've seen them used in anyway), changing the values to unsigned would probably be enough to fix it. (but obviously still wouldn't be percent)
Richard Haselgrove:
--- Quote from: Haselgrove on 23 Nov 2008, 02:51:23 pm ---Get the popcorn ready - got another chunky indices.txt file to watch through - 1344 sample points..
ap_04no08ac_B4_P1_00145_20081123_17576 (1067934018)
--- End quote ---
Finished at full runtime - 7 single pulses and 30 repetitive pulses. Result file attached - full WU datapak available if you want it uploading.
[attachment deleted by admin]
Jason G:
Might as well wack it up, Speed's back up now ;D
Richard Haselgrove:
What's the next description beyond 'jewel'?
ap_04no08ae_B5_P0_00273_20081124_23735 (1068934402)
has 3548 blanking indices, 448 of them with signal strength over 100. Highest signal strength is 213.925781
Would anyone like to estimate the likely scientific value of the next 15 hours work?
[attachment deleted by admin]
Richard Haselgrove:
--- Quote from: Jason G on 24 Nov 2008, 09:46:23 am ---Might as well wack it up, Speed's back up now ;D
--- End quote ---
Will do, give us a mo.
Wow, that's better. >283Kbps sustained. Zip contains v5 result, indices, std_err.
What's the best way to get a v4 result offline to compare?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version