Forum > Linux
Linux port of Alex Kan's?
PatrickV2:
OK, I can handle that. ::)
One final question though: I see there are 2 variants of the SSE 2.4L binary on Crunch3rs site:
- One using FFTW
- Another not using FFTW
Which one should I pick for a P3-700?
Regards, Patrick.
sunu:
I can't help you in this. This post ( http://lunatics.kwsn.net/linux/new-2-4l-version-for-linux-x86.msg6403.html#msg6403 ) says that the FFTW one is slower. I guess you'll have to test it yourself.
Josef W. Segur:
--- Quote from: PatrickV2 on 02 Mar 2009, 03:34:49 pm ---OK, I can handle that. ::)
One final question though: I see there are 2 variants of the SSE 2.4L binary on Crunch3rs site:
- One using FFTW
- Another not using FFTW
Which one should I pick for a P3-700?
Regards, Patrick.
--- End quote ---
If you're going to use a 2.4L version, be sure to merge its app_info rather than the app_info for stock which arkayn posted. As to which 2.4L, the FFTW version may perform slightly better on hosts with small L2 cache but for an Intel CPU I'd suggest the other one unless you want to try each for a week or so and judge for yourself.
Joe
PatrickV2:
--- Quote from: Josef W. Segur on 02 Mar 2009, 07:28:09 pm ---
--- Quote from: PatrickV2 on 02 Mar 2009, 03:34:49 pm ---OK, I can handle that. ::)
One final question though: I see there are 2 variants of the SSE 2.4L binary on Crunch3rs site:
- One using FFTW
- Another not using FFTW
Which one should I pick for a P3-700?
Regards, Patrick.
--- End quote ---
If you're going to use a 2.4L version, be sure to merge its app_info rather than the app_info for stock which arkayn posted. As to which 2.4L, the FFTW version may perform slightly better on hosts with small L2 cache but for an Intel CPU I'd suggest the other one unless you want to try each for a week or so and judge for yourself.
Joe
--- End quote ---
Yes, I did merge the app-infos, and this day, two regular Seti WUs were downloaded where the host previously only downloaded ap wus.
My app_info.xml is:
<app_info>
<app>
<name>setiathome_enhanced</name>
</app>
<file_info>
<name>setiathome-5.15.i686-pc-linux-gnu</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<app_version>
<app_name>setiathome_enhanced</app_name>
<version_num>528</version_num>
<file_ref>
<file_name>setiathome-5.15.i686-pc-linux-gnu</file_name>
<main_program/>
</file_ref>
</app_version>
<app_version>
<app_name>setiathome_enhanced</app_name>
<version_num>603</version_num>
<file_ref>
<file_name>setiathome-5.15.i686-pc-linux-gnu</file_name>
<main_program/>
</file_ref>
</app_version>
<app>
<name>astropulse</name>
</app>
<file_info>
<name>astropulse-5.0.i686-pc-linux-gnu</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<app_version>
<app_name>astropulse</app_name>
<version_num>500</version_num>
<file_ref>
<file_name>astropulse-5.0.i686-pc-linux-gnu</file_name>
<main_program/>
</file_ref>
</app_version>
<app>
<name>astropulse_v5</name>
</app>
<file_info>
<name>astropulse-5.03.i686-pc-linux-gnu</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<app_version>
<app_name>astropulse_v5</app_name>
<version_num>503</version_num>
<file_ref>
<file_name>astropulse-5.03.i686-pc-linux-gnu</file_name>
<main_program/>
</file_ref>
</app_version>
</app_info>
(I hope this comes out ok...)
Regards, Patrick.
Lysia:
Are there any disadvantages in using AK v8 or 2.4L compared to the default 6.03? Are they able to use all work units that 6.03 can use and do they perform the same analysis? Or does 6.03 have a newer, better analysis and with using an older piece of software I might miss signals?
So what made the version numbers rise from 5.x to 6.x?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version