Forum > Discussion Forum

@Andy, I'm unable to PM for some reason :(

<< < (2/2)

ahaveland:
Well, I just got it to compile by switching to dynamic instead of static, and the benchmark completed in half the time, but that is by 1.3 standards...
After installing the libraries, it seems to be running linux ssse3 now.

Obviously static would be better, and Alex's even better as it wouldn't need to use restricted IPP libraries... Meanwhile I haven't a clue why it wouldn't link statically.

Now while it's running, to see how it's doing, I'll start learning the basics of sse primitives and porting...

Porting could evolve from both ends and end up with convergence, and then integrated into the main codebase and tidied up a lot... though this is extremely time consuming.

Jason G:

--- Quote from: ahaveland on 06 Apr 2008, 12:56:11 pm ---Well, I just got it to compile by switching to dynamic instead of static, and the benchmark completed in half the time, but that is by 1.3 standards...
After installing the libraries, it seems to be running linux ssse3 now.

Obviously static would be better, and Alex's even better as it wouldn't need to use restricted IPP libraries... Meanwhile I haven't a clue why it wouldn't link statically.

Now while it's running, to see how it's doing, I'll start learning the basics of sse primitives and porting...

Porting could evolve from both ends and end up with convergence, and then integrated into the main codebase and tidied up a lot... though this is extremely time consuming.

--- End quote ---

Well have fun doing it!  Yeah, on win32, using the static ipp libs requires some include files differences and linking to the staticlib folder content libraries instead.  Dunno how that would function on Linux.

Great that you got a build running so quickly.  If you choose to start on tha AK code I'll need to get you some information.. I'll see if Gecko_R7 can help out here.[PM'd him]

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page