Forum > Linux
Initial public release - SSE2 Linux optimized Seti@Home client (5.15)
s52d:
Thanks!
Very good news first:
343217099 82218989 17 Jun 2006 11:59:38 UTC 26 Jun 2006 12:57:49 UTC Over Success Done 10,045.96 58.92 58.92
343217064 82218967 17 Jun 2006 11:59:38 UTC 23 Jun 2006 11:13:17 UTC Over Success Done 23,267.57 58.87 58.87
(different AR, but impresive anyhow!)
And, normal good news:
works on celeron M (laptop) with 2.4 kernel.
While /usr/bin/file complains on header, it runs fine (2.4-upx). Cool, no need for uncompressed.
works on old Xeon, works on real Pentium-M laptop.
In fact, works on all my linux boxes with sse2, intel/amd CPUs.
Thanks for fast response, time for beer!
73 Iztok
Simon:
Woo hoo ;D
Now if I can only figure out why my SSE builds only work on some Intel chips and not anywhere else...time to install the dev tools on yet another host.
Oh, and I was watching whether anyone reported problems 8) So apart from some small compatibility issues that seem ironed out, it seems it's all good now. Phew!
Regards,
Simon.
JavaPersona:
Simon,
Ni! Ni! Ni!
As a fellow KWSN and avid cruncher I congratulate you on the Linux app! I am using it on 3 Linux hosts, using 2.6 kernels on FC4. They are 2 P4 2.8 (HT'd) and a dual Xeon 3.06 (not HT'd). All tasks have successfully completed and validated.
I may look into compiling my own Windows version; I really appreciate the instructions for that. Thank you very much for your efforts. Good Luck in the future! :)
JavaPersona
Metod, S56RKO:
--- Quote from: Simon on 26 Jun 2006, 03:10:34 pm ---Now if I can only figure out why my SSE builds only work on some Intel chips and not anywhere else...time to install the dev tools on yet another host.
--- End quote ---
If I remember right from the days I did my optimized seti (the old one) binary using ICC, there can be some older chips that don't take well binary compiled using too many -ax branches. They crashed miserably on my P3 Tualatin. The solution was to compile binary specifficaly for that using -xK ...
BR,
Metod
s52d:
How about SSE3?
I looked at some fastest boxes on seti, and most of them (linux) are using
SSE3 Crunchr3 version.
Maybe it is worth trying?
BR 73
Iztok
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version