Forum > Windows
2.4V updated apps.
Crunch3r:
--- Quote from: msattler on 03 Sep 2007, 01:41:15 pm ---The user who had first reported the crash of the SSE app has downloaded the new one and posted that it started OK.
--- End quote ---
Thanks. I did test that one on my old SMP PIII 500MHz. There was and issue in regard to the choosen chirping routine.
However if the app does not crash in the first minute when i does it's optimial function selection, it will work and validate....
;)
Raistmer:
Could anyone list 5.28 over 5.27 improvements, please?
Crunch3r:
--- Quote from: Raistmer on 03 Sep 2007, 01:59:32 pm ---Could anyone list 5.28 over 5.27 improvements, please?
--- End quote ---
it's faster and compatible with 5.28.
We did bench it on several WUs on different CPUS/OS. That's the major difference between your tests and ours. You only do run a single WU and we did test it with a whole bunch of different WUs both line Feed and MultiBeam(ARs) ;)
msattler:
--- Quote from: Crunch3r on 03 Sep 2007, 01:44:55 pm ---
--- Quote from: msattler on 03 Sep 2007, 01:41:15 pm ---The user who had first reported the crash of the SSE app has downloaded the new one and posted that it started OK.
--- End quote ---
Thanks. I did test that one on my old SMP PIII 500MHz. There was and issue in regard to the choosen chirping routine.
However if the app does not crash in the first minute when i does it's optimial function selection, it will work and validate....
;)
--- End quote ---
A second user also reported that the new compile started OK, and a WU in progress that completed with the new app validated, so methinks we're in the clear on that one.
Raistmer:
Great news! :)
BTW, could you please point out test WU that best suitable for speed comparision?
Sure whole bunch gives most precise picture but maybe some faster approach is valuable for comparision of different systems?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version