Forum > Discussion Forum

Simplified stats gathering

<< < (2/2)

Raistmer:
So such database still doesnt' exist, right?
Thanks for answer.
BTW, both benchmarks I found on this site measure elapsed system time, not CPU time. These can be pretty different in multitask OS (with big network activity on PC being tested or if another background processes that consume CPU are running).

Simon:
Nope, not for public consumption yet, anyway.

I've been working (when I find time) on a multi-platform benchmark suite (should work on Windows and Linux, and probably other platforms as well). The Windows version will even have a GUI, and it'll be able to transparently grab and upload results for comparison. Only catch: for "trusted" results, you'll have to be a registered user here - everyone else will be able to use it, too, but their results will be in the "unverified" department (but still viewable).

Every registered user will find a new link on the left when it's ready/released. This link will lead to a page that issues each user their own unique ID, so results can be associated with people who submitted them.

Since benchmarks are only useful for comparison if run as intended (with the WUs we put in there), this should make it easier to single out bogus/unwanted results, if any.

Also, you'll be able to graph your results vs. others according to some parameters - CPU/MHz/OS/...

Obviously, this will include runs of the - current at the time - stock executable from Berkeley, which may even help the project itself gather some performance data they did not have until now.

Regards,
Simon.

Vyper:
Great Simon..

That is really cool indeed.. If used together with various AR Wu's as before we will soon be able to see where the strong and weak part of every different compiled app lies..

Very nice and keep up the good work.. This will be usefull in the future truly..

Kind Regards Vyper

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page