Yes,I've already tried both. SSE3 hasn't given me any speed boost at all, and I have not been able to get a 64-bit version to compile - I keep getting errors like "Target machine type AMD64 is incompatible with module machine type X86".I'm also interested in how a 64-bit version would compare but haven't had more time to get it to work yet. Hope that helped,Simon.
Quote from: Simon on 30 Jun 2006, 09:46:02 pmYes,I've already tried both. SSE3 hasn't given me any speed boost at all, and I have not been able to get a 64-bit version to compile - I keep getting errors like "Target machine type AMD64 is incompatible with module machine type X86".I'm also interested in how a 64-bit version would compare but haven't had more time to get it to work yet. Hope that helped,Simon.Have you downloaded the IPP package for EM64T.. It said that it wasn't required to use Vision 2005 , i think you can use 2003 version and still compile EM64T through settings for the compilation..Just a thought..//Vyper
I just found out that the trial versions of IPP for Windows (and only IPP) don't include redistributable files at all - so that ipp_w7.h is not the only thing missing from them, sadly. Since I do have other licenses installed, I did not check that too closely. It looked complete when I installed it once to test, and they said it's the same - well, it isn't. Depending on what license file you use to install IPP, different things get installed. There is a way to get the files out of the installer, but that's probably not legal. So this will make it difficult for people to compile on Windows I'm afraid (unless they get an IPP license, that is).I'm almost done with my letter to Intel - I still cannot understand why they offer non-commercial tools for Linux, but not Windows. I'll put that in there as well.Regards,Simon.