+- +-
Say hello if visiting :) by Gecko
11 Jan 2023, 07:43:05 pm

Seti is down again by Mike
09 Aug 2017, 10:02:44 am

Some considerations regarding OpenCL MultiBeam app tuning from algorithm view by Raistmer
11 Dec 2016, 06:30:56 am

Loading APU to the limit: performance considerations by Mike
05 Nov 2016, 06:49:26 am

Better sleep on Windows - new round by Raistmer
26 Aug 2016, 02:02:31 pm

Author Topic: Optimised apps intel quads.....  (Read 9270 times)

KWSN - Sir Brian

  • Guest
Optimised apps intel quads.....
« on: 28 Mar 2007, 09:13:09 am »
Hi Simon

as the intel quad core cpus are effectively dual dual cores I think I've noticed that cache coherency is affecting the performance of the optimised apps quite considerably (I'll post some examples later tonight as I'm at work at the moment and they block seti@home!  >:( >:(  ) 

basically I have a Core2 6300 (dual core), a dual proc 5120 (dual core) machine and a dual proc 5320 (quad core).   I was expect similar performance per WU from each machine but the 5120 is about 15% slower than the 6300 and the 5320 is 15% slower than the 5120!

I've started using crunch3r's cpu_affinity capable boinc client but it appears to only of had a small performance improvement.  any idea's?  do you see a similar issue with your woodcrest 5160 machine when comparing it to Core2 E6700 machines?

also it'd be really nice to add a feature to the benchmarking tool to select to utilise all available cores when bechmarking rather than just one, as this issue doesn't surface with the benchmarking tool.

Cheers

Keith

KWSN - Sir Brian

  • Guest
Re: Optimised apps intel quads.....
« Reply #1 on: 28 Mar 2007, 01:23:51 pm »
OK here's an example of what I'm talking about...


Core2 6300

time taken 6004 seconds

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=506464510

Xeon 5120

time taken 7696 seconds

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=506464278

Xeon 5320

time taken 8740 seconds

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=506464656


Ni!

Offline Devaster

  • Volunteer Developer
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 653
  • I like Duke !!!
Re: Optimised apps intel quads.....
« Reply #2 on: 28 Mar 2007, 03:20:36 pm »
better quad core base for cache use apps is a 4x4 by AMD : http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/11/30/brute_force_quad_cores/

BenHer

  • Guest
Re: Optimised apps intel quads.....
« Reply #3 on: 29 Mar 2007, 05:36:35 pm »
From what I read here...

You have 3 systems with 3 different processors (maybe more, 3 u listed).

6300 = 1 CPU * 2 cores = 2 crunchers
5120 = 2 CPU * 2 cores = 4 crunchers
5320 = 2 CPU * 4 cores = 8 crunchers

You have not told us the memory speed for each system or how the motherboards are setup
(FSB, RAM timings, etc.)

But from a simple Guess I would think that the optmized cruncher is simply running into a memory bandwidth problem.  Trying to crunch faster than RAM can be delivered to however many cores there are.

Each added cruncher wants RAM at a certain speed, but the systems are simply being overwhelmed.


Offline Devaster

  • Volunteer Developer
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 653
  • I like Duke !!!
Re: Optimised apps intel quads.....
« Reply #4 on: 30 Mar 2007, 12:51:53 am »
Standard Quad core memory bottleneck ... yesterday i have test seti cruncher on 4x4 (my friend have it :o) :

standard SEE2 1 cruncher : 7032 sec
standard SSE2 4 crunchers : 7216 sec


 8)

sorry i forgot links ... take times informative only

 

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?
Members
Total Members: 97
Latest: ToeBee
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 59559
Total Topics: 1672
Most Online Today: 355
Most Online Ever: 983
(20 Jan 2020, 03:17:55 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 203
Total: 203
Powered by EzPortal