Forum > Windows
Wanna try AMD optimized seti ?
Crunch3r:
--- Quote from: msattler on 16 Mar 2007, 01:58:06 am ---I would test it on my FX60 rig if you or Simon can advise me how to get it to run without the DLL error I posted this morning.
--- End quote ---
1. download ---> http://www.dependencywalker.com/depends22_x86.zip
2. extract the program
3. run "depends.exe" and open "seti_5.17_devaster_ACML_GFX.exe"
4. after that it'll show you what dlll's are missing to run thhe app.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P.S. Personally this is my opinion ......
ACML is to way slow .... the whole thing was tried back while we had non_enhanced seti ... IPP is way faster even using AMD CPU's it's not worth the hassle.
The thing to have a look at is to use IPP or MKL for powerspectrum an Transpose.
Anything else is not even worth a try if you're going for speed.
msattler:
I have already downloaded and unzipped the program. What or where is 'depends.exe'? I simply cut and pasted the app into Knabench and get the DLL error. I get a DLL error when I just try to run the app by double clicking it in the temp folder. MSVCR80.dll could not be found.
Devaster:
my fault ... I always forgot add a MS VC runtime .... :-[
in last APL (comparable with IPP) is a fft too so i try this version ...
a question : how many threads wanna use in APL ? one or more ?
today morning i have a 4 hours power outage, so sorry i have do only a vectorized powerspectrum ....
Devaster:
now AMD version is veeeery slow in search pulses and triplets ... say CodeAnalyst.
iam trying maximal vectorize it....
and transpose functions too.
maybe it would be better when a MS c++ compiler can unroll the loops ???
Haos:
If only you can make it faster than generic AMD (Barton core) SSE version client... I`d be very happy!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version