+- +-
Say hello if visiting :) by Gecko
11 Jan 2023, 07:43:05 pm

Seti is down again by Mike
09 Aug 2017, 10:02:44 am

Some considerations regarding OpenCL MultiBeam app tuning from algorithm view by Raistmer
11 Dec 2016, 06:30:56 am

Loading APU to the limit: performance considerations by Mike
05 Nov 2016, 06:49:26 am

Better sleep on Windows - new round by Raistmer
26 Aug 2016, 02:02:31 pm

Author Topic: Wanna try AMD optimized seti ?  (Read 18588 times)

Offline Simon

  • Ni!
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 1045
    • Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No...its-the.net!
Re: Wanna try AMD optimized seti ?
« Reply #15 on: 15 Mar 2007, 12:28:33 pm »
I think I haven't had time to test it yet ;)

Sometime tonight, I'll be able to tell you more.

HTH,
Simon.

msattler

  • Guest
Re: Wanna try AMD optimized seti ?
« Reply #16 on: 15 Mar 2007, 12:39:31 pm »
I just tried again.  Copied the 3 DLL files into the science apps file along with the test app, still no go.  Got the same WBEM dll error.  That's alll I have time to try before I go to work today, I'll check when I get home late tonight, and if y'all have found a fix, I will do a test run on my FX60 against the patched -PM app I am currently running.

Offline Crunch3r

  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 602
    • 64 bit boinc clients
Re: Wanna try AMD optimized seti ?
« Reply #17 on: 15 Mar 2007, 03:52:33 pm »
I've tested it ... CPU PD@3.6 GHz

AMD client: <wu_cpu_time>243.687500</wu_cpu_time>
2.2B : <wu_cpu_time>179.421875</wu_cpu_time>


I want to share something with you: The three little sentences that will get you through life. Number 1: Cover for me. Number 2: Oh, good idea, Boss! Number 3: It was like that when I got here.

Homer Simpson

Offline Devaster

  • Volunteer Developer
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 653
  • I like Duke !!!
Re: Wanna try AMD optimized seti ?
« Reply #18 on: 15 Mar 2007, 04:13:47 pm »
I've tested it ... CPU PD@3.6 GHz

AMD client: <wu_cpu_time>243.687500</wu_cpu_time>
2.2B : <wu_cpu_time>179.421875</wu_cpu_time>




thanx cruncher.and validation was ok ?
next version has : malloc,vectorized powerspectrum,and vectorized memcopy (APL)....
would be uploaded tomorrow about 1500(GMT+1)

any results from AMD based machine ?
« Last Edit: 15 Mar 2007, 04:20:43 pm by Devaster »

msattler

  • Guest
Re: Wanna try AMD optimized seti ?
« Reply #19 on: 16 Mar 2007, 01:58:06 am »
I would test it on my FX60 rig if you or Simon can advise me how to get it to run without the DLL error I posted this morning.

Offline Crunch3r

  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 602
    • 64 bit boinc clients
Re: Wanna try AMD optimized seti ?
« Reply #20 on: 16 Mar 2007, 02:24:07 am »
I would test it on my FX60 rig if you or Simon can advise me how to get it to run without the DLL error I posted this morning.

1. download ---> http://www.dependencywalker.com/depends22_x86.zip
2. extract the program
3. run "depends.exe" and open "seti_5.17_devaster_ACML_GFX.exe"
4. after that it'll show you what dlll's are missing to run thhe app.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


P.S. Personally this is my opinion ......

ACML is to way slow .... the whole thing was tried back while we had non_enhanced seti ... IPP is way faster even using AMD CPU's it's not worth the hassle.

The thing to have a look at is to use IPP or MKL for powerspectrum an Transpose.

Anything else is not even worth a try if you're going for speed.





I want to share something with you: The three little sentences that will get you through life. Number 1: Cover for me. Number 2: Oh, good idea, Boss! Number 3: It was like that when I got here.

Homer Simpson

msattler

  • Guest
Re: Wanna try AMD optimized seti ?
« Reply #21 on: 16 Mar 2007, 02:54:44 am »
I have already downloaded and unzipped the program.  What or where is 'depends.exe'?  I simply cut and pasted the app into Knabench and get the DLL error.  I get a DLL error when I just try to run the app by double clicking it in the temp folder.  MSVCR80.dll could not be found.

Offline Devaster

  • Volunteer Developer
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 653
  • I like Duke !!!
Re: Wanna try AMD optimized seti ?
« Reply #22 on: 16 Mar 2007, 10:26:01 am »
my fault ... I always forgot  add a MS VC runtime .... :-[

in last APL (comparable with IPP)  is a fft too so i try this version ...

a question : how many threads wanna use in APL ? one or more ?

today morning i have a 4 hours power outage, so sorry i have do only a vectorized powerspectrum ....


Offline Devaster

  • Volunteer Developer
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 653
  • I like Duke !!!
Re: Wanna try AMD optimized seti ?
« Reply #23 on: 20 Mar 2007, 05:55:30 pm »
now AMD version  is veeeery slow in search pulses and triplets ... say CodeAnalyst.

iam trying maximal vectorize it....
and transpose functions  too.

maybe it would be better when  a MS c++ compiler can unroll the loops ???

Haos

  • Guest
Re: Wanna try AMD optimized seti ?
« Reply #24 on: 15 Apr 2007, 01:00:25 pm »
If only you can make it faster than generic AMD (Barton core) SSE version client... I`d be very happy!

Offline Devaster

  • Volunteer Developer
  • Knight who says 'Ni!'
  • *****
  • Posts: 653
  • I like Duke !!!
Re: Wanna try AMD optimized seti ?
« Reply #25 on: 15 Apr 2007, 03:21:16 pm »
for now i have stopped any work on this version beacuse i am working on gpu version ....

 

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?
Members
Total Members: 97
Latest: ToeBee
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 59559
Total Topics: 1672
Most Online Today: 652
Most Online Ever: 983
(20 Jan 2020, 03:17:55 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 639
Total: 639
Powered by EzPortal