Forum > Windows
optimized sources
Jason G:
Change of Plan:
--- Quote --- Intel(R) C++ Compiler 10.1 Integration(s) in Microsoft Visual Studio* is already installed.
Installation can continue; however, you will not be able to use the Intel C++ Compiler 10.1 or 9.0 within the Visual Studio IDE
--- End quote ---
So I will switch to my 64 bit boot drive, and install both 32 & 64 bit parallel composer there instead.
Jason G:
Heinz, have 64 & 32 bit Parallel composer beta (update 2) installed .... Where can I find the fibonacci sample? (the stuff I see here looks more boring)
_heinz:
--- Quote from: Jason G on 28 Nov 2008, 11:16:22 am ---Heinz, have 64 & 32 bit Parallel composer beta (update 2) installed .... Where can I find the fibonacci sample? (the stuff I see here looks more boring)
--- End quote ---
fibonacci is part of TBB
If TBB is installed you have this sample
it is in C:\I\SC\ITBB\examples\test_all\fibonacci\vc8
analog what you choose as installdir
Jason G:
Hmmm, I have TBB on my other (32-bit) drive ... maybe I can install it here, will try.
[Hmmm, so parallel composer doesn't actually have TBB in it then .... ??? that seems a bit odd, maybe they expect you'll use pure openmp.. what about IPP, I suppose that's not there either which would make this ICC 11 ?]
32 & 64 bit fibonacci sample built & ran. Will consider fully migrating to 64 bit platform for holidays in a few weeks. It'll be painful, but about time probably.
Jason
Leaps-from-Shadows:
--- Quote ---ahh.. cpu package.. 12 MB
--- End quote ---
This is wrong, unless you have a not-yet-released version of the Nehalem processor.
Currently released versions have 32k L1 instruction cache per core, 32k L1 data cache per core, 256k L2 cache per core, and 8MB shared L3 cache. They only have four physical cores, so that's 128k L1 instruction cache total, 128k L1 data cache total, 1MB L2 cache total, and 8MB L3 cache. The four HT virtual cores aren't physical cores, so they don't have cache of their own.
I don't know how much difference this would make, but I thought I'd point it out anyway...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version