Forum > Windows

New apps based on code revision 2.2 'Noo? No, Ni!' have been released!

<< < (7/22) > >>

Furex:

--- Quote from: BenHer on 17 Feb 2007, 02:10:34 pm ---that it in fact does use 32Meg less memory when running (like it was written to do)?
--- End quote ---

http://www.progettosi.dyndns.org/forum/Smileys/smiley_alive/worshiper.gif

Lloyd:
I see the 2.2l with graphics app is up now.  Thanks for letting me know it was in the works.

In the meanwhile, I found the benchmarks (in the download section - duh!)  I'll just leave 2.0  on there for now and run them, then repeat the process with 2.2

You aren't kidding that it's a slow process to run them all!  My first try resulted in a bunch of error messages that the app couldn't find the SAH file (?!).  I'm trying a couple of things differently (with a fresh download), so I hope it will work this time.

Urs Echternacht:
Here is my first computation error with rev.2.2: a 0xc0000005 !
Just one thing: the KWSN_2.2_SSE_Ben-Joe.pdb file that came with the executable is not used in the Windows Runtime Debugger. What to do to have it used next time ?

[attachment deleted by admin]

Ronon Dex:
With the (SSSE3-Core2) Rev 1.41 it was sometimes that I had invalid results...
(When I remember correct, this were only with "normal/good" crunching WUs)

Since I have the (SSSE3-Core2) Rev 2.2 running I have two invalid results...
But "only":
SETI@Home Informational message -9 result_overflow
NOTE: The number of results detected exceeds the storage space allocated.
...results.

O.K., I got a few "overflow"- WUs, so around 30.
So it's "only" ~7 % mistakes... ;)

So the mistakes like with Rev 1.41 are away that sometimes the good crunched WUs don't get Credits?
But the new app have now maybe sometimes problems with the "overflow"- WUs?

Hey! It's not a big problem! :)

I wanted only to inform you! ;)

BenHer:
Hmm...maybe Joe's fixes increased the accuracy too much  :o

No..really...if Joe's fixes give more accurate results and more precision on some sin/cos & angle results, then it might cause mis-compares with the standard application.   The more accurate reusult would be better science, but would fail in validating against other clients.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version