Forum > Discussion Forum
Better sleep on Windows - new round
Raistmer:
Mike's results:
WU : AR075.wu
MB8_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATi_HD5_r3330.exe -verb -nog :
Elapsed 474.039 secs
CPU 228.042 secs
MB8_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATi_HD5_r3486.exe -use_sleep :
Elapsed 497.494 secs, speedup: -4.95% ratio: 0.95x
CPU 180.618 secs, speedup: 20.80% ratio: 1.26x
MB8_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATi_HD5_r3500.exe -use_sleep :
Elapsed 500.524 secs, speedup: -5.59% ratio: 0.95x
CPU 177.576 secs, speedup: 22.13% ratio: 1.28x
MB8_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATi_HD5_Sleep0.exe -use_sleep :
Elapsed 472.639 secs, speedup: 0.30% ratio: 1.00x
CPU 406.617 secs, speedup: -78.31% ratio: 0.56x
MB8_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATi_HD5_Sleep1.exe -use_sleep :
Elapsed 474.594 secs, speedup: -0.12% ratio: 1.00x
CPU 285.856 secs, speedup: -25.35% ratio: 0.80x
MB8_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATi_HD5_SwitchTothread.exe -use_sleep :
Elapsed 472.914 secs, speedup: 0.24% ratio: 1.00x
CPU 407.116 secs, speedup: -78.53% ratio: 0.56x
GT720, CPU busy, use_sleep active results:
MB8_win_x86_SSE3_OpenCL_NV_SoG_Sleep0.exe :
Elapsed 3031.125 secs, speedup: 46.35% ratio: 1.86x
CPU 365.136 secs, speedup: 90.83% ratio: 10.90x
MB8_win_x86_SSE3_OpenCL_NV_SoG_Sleep1.exe :
Elapsed 3016.956 secs, speedup: 46.60% ratio: 1.87x
CPU 324.747 secs, speedup: 91.84% ratio: 12.26x
MB8_win_x86_SSE3_OpenCL_NV_SoG_STT.exe :
Elapsed 3037.066 secs, speedup: 46.24% ratio: 1.86x
CPU 348.428 secs, speedup: 91.25% ratio: 11.42x
setiathome_8.16_windows_intelx86__opencl_nvidia_SoG.exe :
Elapsed 3012.764 secs, speedup: 46.67% ratio: 1.88x
CPU 1721.908 secs, speedup: 56.74% ratio: 2.31x
setiathome_8.17_windows_intelx86__opencl_nvidia_SoG.exe :
Elapsed 3016.387 secs, speedup: 46.61% ratio: 1.87x
CPU 324.966 secs, speedup: 91.83% ratio: 12.25x
So, for these places current choice of sleep(1) is optimal one even w/o high-prec timer activation.
I'll repreat test with -high_prec_timer now for GT720
And counters:
Sleep0: class SleepQuantum: total=13556.229, N=3065, <>=4.4229134, min=0.011274812 max=17.502548
Sleep1: class SleepQuantum: total=3163.4568, N=3153, <>=1.0033165, min=0.86198002 max=40.154495
STT: class SleepQuantum: total=16757.236, N=2412, <>=6.9474446, min=0.011177354 max=18.476677
Raistmer:
binaries updated to fix newly introduced bug in signal logging.
WARNING: don't use binaries from V2 online.
Mike:
WU : AR075.wu
MB8_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATi_HD5_r3330.exe -verb -nog :
Elapsed 474.039 secs
CPU 228.042 secs
MB8_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATi_HD5_r3500.exe :
Elapsed 476.706 secs, speedup: -0.56% ratio: 0.99x
CPU 228.994 secs, speedup: -0.42% ratio: 1.00x
MB8_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATi_HD5_Sleep0.exe :
Elapsed 475.049 secs, speedup: -0.21% ratio: 1.00x
CPU 289.210 secs, speedup: -26.82% ratio: 0.79x
MB8_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATi_HD5_Sleep1.exe :
Elapsed 475.277 secs, speedup: -0.26% ratio: 1.00x
CPU 288.009 secs, speedup: -26.30% ratio: 0.79x
MB8_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATi_HD5_STT.exe :
Elapsed 474.973 secs, speedup: -0.20% ratio: 1.00x
CPU 288.415 secs, speedup: -26.47% ratio: 0.79x
WU : PG1327_v7.wu
MB8_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATi_HD5_r3330.exe -verb -nog :
Elapsed 62.481 secs
CPU 36.145 secs
MB8_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATi_HD5_r3500.exe :
Elapsed 61.959 secs, speedup: 0.84% ratio: 1.01x
CPU 36.348 secs, speedup: -0.56% ratio: 0.99x
MB8_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATi_HD5_Sleep0.exe :
Elapsed 62.114 secs, speedup: 0.59% ratio: 1.01x
CPU 42.370 secs, speedup: -17.22% ratio: 0.85x
MB8_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATi_HD5_Sleep1.exe :
Elapsed 61.824 secs, speedup: 1.05% ratio: 1.01x
CPU 42.557 secs, speedup: -17.74% ratio: 0.85x
MB8_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATi_HD5_STT.exe :
Elapsed 62.313 secs, speedup: 0.27% ratio: 1.00x
CPU 42.604 secs, speedup: -17.87% ratio: 0.85x
CPU consumption is higher on all versions.
Raistmer:
I see no -use_sleep used.
Is it idle CPU? or busy CPU run?
Mike:
--- Quote from: Raistmer on 22 Aug 2016, 05:43:00 am ---I see no -use_sleep used.
Is it idle CPU? or busy CPU run?
--- End quote ---
Well i better repeat. :o
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version