Forum > Windows
Core 2 QX6700 SSSE3 crunching time
Sirad:
Hello.
Im Running the 2.2B App and i make around ~55 to 65 Credit per Hour (depends on WU, but i crunch what i get)
All Cores currently running at 3.6 Ghz, enter 3.8 or 3.9 this we (not yet because i've only a single radi installed and my triple will arrive end this week since then i have to run at 3.6 to prevent
hell-of-overheating) Heat is the mayour prob with those fine devices. but they run fine, even at 90° core. (but i dont want higher than 70° so i clocked back)
Superpi 1M is done in 13,531 seconds at 3,8 Ghz (well dont know if its cool or not but lotsa people posts those numbers around so i think its necessary anyway)
My ram sucks. Really sucks. ???
greetings
jezek:
--- Quote from: nutsalot on 10 Mar 2007, 10:11:32 am ---I deployed the SSE3 optimised client on my Qx6700 yesterday and it makes a big difference to my setup. I am crunching a large workunit (62 credits) in 4000 secs and because there 4 going at once this sure is a good way to munch those units.
My moderatley overclocked Quad core specs is as follows :-
Qx6700 on Asus P5D Deluxe FSB (290x11) 3190Mhz
Corsair XMS2 PC6200C4 at 5-5-5-18 at 966Mhz
BTW I have deployed 4 of the optimised code versions across 5 active machines and they have all experienced a large step in performance. :o
Sir Nutsalot of KWSN. ;D
--- End quote ---
Msattler was right... you have to mismasched some posts.
My RAM (Stock CL4 @ 800MHz) are now running 960MHz with 5-5-5-15 and 2.2V
My opinion about this RAM is that only revision 1.1 vwith Micron chips can run 1065MHz but with lots of voltage and CL5 timing only...
I have revision 2.1 which haven't got Micron chips.
My QX6700 is on 3200MHz (320x10) with some additional volts (BOIS vcore 1.45V). It runs pretty nice more than 2 weeks. And I am just little step behind the Batman ;D (in top comps).
But msattler is far far away...
Fast,faster,the fastest crunching...
P.S for msatter: How fast you are going? (If you can say it and of course if you want to)
Your RAC is pretty high and I think untouchable for me...
Sirad:
--- Quote from: jezek on 16 Mar 2007, 03:45:49 pm ---P.S for msatter: How fast you are going? (If you can say it and of course if you want to)
Your RAC is pretty high and I think untouchable for me...
--- End quote ---
Not unreachable. anyone who breaks the 60 Credits/Hour will pass that actual rac.
i think a stable rac of >6000 is possible with a intel-quad-core system. Depends upon quality of cpu
example:
NI-Stats-Credit Per CPU Hour: 60.2856 (my computer) that is at 3,6 Ghz speed only average 92% running a day. gives a already (theoretical) rac of 5760
so theres nothing really impossible at all.
dont underestimate the power of quadcores :-)
msattler:
--- Quote from: Sirad on 16 Mar 2007, 06:03:07 pm ---
--- Quote from: jezek on 16 Mar 2007, 03:45:49 pm ---P.S for msatter: How fast you are going? (If you can say it and of course if you want to)
Your RAC is pretty high and I think untouchable for me...
--- End quote ---
Not unreachable. anyone who breaks the 60 Credits/Hour will pass that actual rac.
i think a stable rac of >6000 is possible with a intel-quad-core system. Depends upon quality of cpu
example:
NI-Stats-Credit Per CPU Hour: 60.2856 (my computer) that is at 3,6 Ghz speed only average 92% running a day. gives a already (theoretical) rac of 5760
so theres nothing really impossible at all.
dont underestimate the power of quadcores :-)
--- End quote ---
Welll..... The kitties have been busy. I am currently trying to blast my RAM bandwidth up a bit. My quad is maxed at 3.4mhz on air, that's all it's gonna do. So I have been playing with RAM. A OCd quad is a memory hungry beast. Just got some PC8800 OCZ , and have it runniing at 1278mhz, 5-5-5-18-42 timings, 1.45vdimm. I don't think it's gonna hang in there, but it's fun to watch it run while it does.
It crashed while I was gone this evening, so I bumped the vdimm from 1.4 t9 1.45. See if it holds.
Sirad:
--- Quote from: msattler on 16 Mar 2007, 08:27:04 pm ---
--- Quote from: Sirad on 16 Mar 2007, 06:03:07 pm ---
--- Quote from: jezek on 16 Mar 2007, 03:45:49 pm ---P.S for msatter: How fast you are going? (If you can say it and of course if you want to)
Your RAC is pretty high and I think untouchable for me...
--- End quote ---
Not unreachable. anyone who breaks the 60 Credits/Hour will pass that actual rac.
i think a stable rac of >6000 is possible with a intel-quad-core system. Depends upon quality of cpu
example:
NI-Stats-Credit Per CPU Hour: 60.2856 (my computer) that is at 3,6 Ghz speed only average 92% running a day. gives a already (theoretical) rac of 5760
so theres nothing really impossible at all.
dont underestimate the power of quadcores :-)
--- End quote ---
Welll..... The kitties have been busy. I am currently trying to blast my RAM bandwidth up a bit. My quad is maxed at 3.4mhz on air, that's all it's gonna do. So I have been playing with RAM. A OCd quad is a memory hungry beast. Just got some PC8800 OCZ , and have it runniing at 1278mhz, 5-5-5-18-42 timings, 1.45vdimm. I don't think it's gonna hang in there, but it's fun to watch it run while it does.
It crashed while I was gone this evening, so I bumped the vdimm from 1.4 t9 1.45. See if it holds.
--- End quote ---
Well. crunch on, ill try to catch up.
This oughta be fun. the more people those quadcores buy the less amd is in the list. i think amd shall press out some real good thing against this immense prozessor.... i like my quaddy. had to switch back to 3,55 Ghz heat sucks and my radi ISNT DELIVERED YET sucks. but anyway speeded up to:
Credit Per CPU Hour: 61.74
even at 3,5Ghz and hell-of-killer-wu's
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version