Forum > Windows

Windows SSE4-Core 2 32-bit V5.15, R-1.41

(1/2) > >>

Dirk Sadowski:
Hello Simon!
Hello optimizers!

I read that there are sometimes probs with the:
Windows SSE4-Core 2 32-bit V5.15 'Chicken Good!' (R-1.41|+more_vec|xT)

Have a look here:
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=35728&nowrap=true#473429


This happen only when you overclock?
Or it's a little bug?


Greetings!

Dirk Sadowski:
If I have the QX6700...

If maybe every 10th WU is invalid...

...then maybe it's better to use the
SSE3-Intel P4/PD optimized Windows S@H app (Rev.2.0)
and not the
Intel Core 2 SSSE3 optimized 5.15 app (Rev.1.41)?

How much less performance have this SSE3 to the SSSE3?


Greetings!

Simon:
My Woodcrest system doesn't seem to have this problem, really.

Dirk, do whatever you feel comfortable with - in my case, I'm comfortable with leaving it running on the Woodcrest until something quicker comes along.

Regards,
Simon.

Dirk Sadowski:

Hello Simon!

I looked at some Core 2 Duo, Core 2 Quad and Xeon too, and sometimes they have invalid results...
They crunch "normal" but didn't got Credits...

I found three invalid WUs from your C2Dx Xeon 51xx (Woodcrest) too :

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=427847127
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=427082185
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=426441006


You can imagine what could be wrong?


Greetings!

Simon:
Again:
No!

Also:
I'm not especially anxious about 3 invalid results - currently, that host has hundreds online, so it's less than one percent.

As is the case with any optimized app - YMMV (your mileage may vary, oder auf deutsch: Benutzung auf eigene Gefahr). Do what you feel comfortable with, please don't expect me to tell you what that is ;)

Regards,
Simon.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page