Forum > GPU crunching

x38g reports

<< < (42/58) > >>

perryjay:
Starting the thread on NC should be of help. I've noticed a number of my wingmen with the 560Ti throwing out -9s and other bad results giving them an invalid or error. It would be good to see if it is something in the card itself causing it.

perryjay:
Here's a strange one http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=771323155 Check out computer 5257703. He's showing he has two GTS460s but all his GPU work is coming up no GPUs found.

Okay, looked a little closer, he's running driver version 258.96 with the x32f app. I tried to PM him but we will see if he responds.

Jason G:

--- Quote from: perryjay on 15 Jul 2011, 11:05:46 am ---Here's a strange one http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=771323155 Check out computer 5257703. He's showing he has two GTS460s but all his GPU work is coming up no GPUs found.

--- End quote ---

He probably installed Boinc as a service (protected application)

perryjay:
That's possible too. I didn't think of that.

I hope it's just the driver. He's running an I7 and cranking out a lot of good work on it. With those two 460s running he'll take off like a house afire.   ;D



another interesting one  http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=763277874  they tried three times to prove me wrong when I didn't match that first -9 and still refused to give me canonical.   ;D


Another one inconclusive  http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=782642742  He's running a 470 with v38g. He found 20 spikes I found 12.  Looking at his work I'd say I'll win.

Jason G:

--- Quote from: perryjay on 15 Jul 2011, 11:13:43 am ---another interesting one  http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=763277874  they tried three times to prove me wrong when I didn't match that first -9 and still refused to give me canonical.   ;D

--- End quote ---

Nice, the Cuda23 ones really dropped the ball with that task, the one that processed successfully missed a reportable gaussian the CPU apps & yourself picked up.  That pretty much correlates with the chirp + gaussian weirdnesses we've been seeing, and need to investigate & understand more deeply.  It is logical that the canonical was chosen as the AKv8 one, as it's likely 'in between' the 6.03 & yours, so representative.  I also take it as a sign that x38g was moving in the right direction to make better matches to CPU apps on some types of results, but there is still work to do.


--- Quote ---Another one inconclusive  http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=782642742  He's running a 470 with v38g. He found 20 spikes I found 12.  Looking at his work I'd say I'll win.
--- End quote ---
  He could have power or cooling issues or anything, hard to say.  Once some of the more urgent issues are solved, I'll start playing with nVidia APi to see if I can extract thermal / power / clock info .  Decent info along those lines could paint a clearer picture  in some cases, if some info could be printed to stderr.

Jason

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version