Forum > GPU crunching
x38g reports
Jason G:
--- Quote from: perryjay on 10 Jul 2011, 12:01:43 pm ---Will it ever end? ;D
--- End quote ---
Yes it will... The -12's will end altogether, as soon as the V7 autocorrelation code is stable, then I get time to look at & rewrite the triplet kernels (probably using a combination of Raistmer's opencl approach & my max bandwidth kernels)
Legacy builds disappear with the transition to V7, and newer builds are hoped to converge CPU & GPU results cross platform... So that puts an end to another bunch of weak similarity issues.
Long road... But I think when Joe's work, the project's polishing & all the builds are V7 compatible, then we could be looking for new sets of problems to solve... Or better yet, optimising again instead of troubleshooting & bugfixing.
Just better ask these hardware manufacturer's to stop devising new stuff so we can catch up for a while ;)
perryjay:
Oh, it seems like since I cut back on my over clock I have been getting fewer inconclusives. We may have been chasing a problem on my side. Most all of my incons right now are caused by a wingman's 450 throwing out -9s. I PMd him but I don't know if it will do any good.
Jason G:
--- Quote from: perryjay on 10 Jul 2011, 12:39:32 pm ---... Most all of my incons right now are caused by a wingman's 450 throwing out -9s. I PMd him but I don't know if it will do any good.
--- End quote ---
What's he running ?
perryjay:
Appears to be stock. He also has a 430 in that rig that is turning in good results. http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=1986202415
I have been teamed up with him on quite a few work units.
Claggy:
I've just come across this invalid result from one of my wingmen:
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=1973794071
Claggy
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version