Forum > GPU crunching
x38g reports
perryjay:
Here's a pretty one... http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=762509253
perryjay:
--- Quote from: Slavac on 08 Jul 2011, 06:50:16 pm ---Is there any truth to the rumor that 39e runs at a lower RAC than 38?
--- End quote ---
I believe it runs just a little bit slower than the 38 but that is because it is trying to find some problems some of us were having. I don't know how much that is going to effect your RAC since there are so many variables. With the new credit system you really can't tell since it depends on your wingman's time too.
Slavac:
Got my first invalid on the 39 build. What I find interesting is that 38 was throwing all sorts of invalids at me, 39 is almost entirely invalid free. Lovely.
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=1974204985
Slavac:
--- Quote from: perryjay on 08 Jul 2011, 06:59:55 pm ---
--- Quote from: Slavac on 08 Jul 2011, 06:50:16 pm ---Is there any truth to the rumor that 39e runs at a lower RAC than 38?
--- End quote ---
I believe it runs just a little bit slower than the 38 but that is because it is trying to find some problems some of us were having. I don't know how much that is going to effect your RAC since there are so many variables. With the new credit system you really can't tell since it depends on your wingman's time too.
--- End quote ---
It seems to be running 500-700 RAC slower on my machine than 38 though IMO that's such a small figure that it's not worth even mentioning. Was hoping to get some ammunition to belay the "39's horrible for your RAC don't download it" garbage seen at SETI Home.
perryjay:
--- Quote from: Slavac on 08 Jul 2011, 08:31:05 pm ---Got my first invalid on the 39 build. What I find interesting is that 38 was throwing all sorts of invalids at me, 39 is almost entirely invalid free. Lovely.
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=1974204985
--- End quote ---
You picked the wrong work unit. Your invalid was http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=1974204984 Looks like you had two gang up on you by not finding those 8 gaussians you found.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version